ArticleCureus2023
Clinicopathological Parameters of Haemophilia Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emicizumab in Children with Severe Hemophilia A.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Serum Vitamin D in Children with Hemophilia A and Its Association with Joint Health and Quality of Life.Hematology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHaemophilia affects a large number of people all over the world, yet very little is known about the clinical manifestations and diagnostic protocols of the condition in areas with limited access to resources in developing countries. Understanding the clinical spectrum and diagnostic approach will help with the design of measures to address the situation in these places. The primary objective of this study was to examine the clinicopathological parameters of haemophiliac patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom the departmental archive, a thorough history of each patient was retrieved, including values of bleeding time, prothrombin time, activated partial prothrombin time, and percentage of specific factor activity.
resultsOut of a total of 385 cases over the period of six years, 86.75% were classified as haemophilia A and 13.25% of cases were diagnosed as haemophilia B. In terms of the severity of the disease, 44.93% were classified as severe, 42.08% as moderate, and 12.99% as mild. Joint bleeding was the first and most typical clinical manifestation of the disease, accounting for 34.80% of cases, followed by ecchymosis (23.12%), post-traumatic bleeding (12.73%), epistaxis (12.20%), and gum bleeding (8.05%). 1.56% of patients had a positive screening test for the hepatitis C virus, followed by 1.30% for HIV and 0.78% for hepatitis B surface antigen.
conclusionIn the presence of joint bleeding, ecchymosis, and post-traumatic bleeding in an otherwise healthy individual, a clinician should be alerted to the possibility that the patient has haemophilia and should request a work-up for the bleeding disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.