Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37575860›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Myoinositol Versus Metformin in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Ranita Bodepudi, Saniya Seher, Shenel A Khan, Sonya Emmanuel, Vivig Shantha Kumar, Resheek Nerella, Basim Shaman Ameen, Dev Patel, Jabez David John, Safeera Khan

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Metformin and Myo-Inositol: A Comparative Analysis.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Delphi consensus on the diagnostic criteria of polycystic ovary syndrome.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ranita BodepudiMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Saniya SeherMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Shenel A KhanMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sonya EmmanuelMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Vivig Shantha KumarMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Resheek NerellaMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Basim Shaman AmeenMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Dev PatelInternal Medicine, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Jabez David JohnMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Safeera KhanMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · USLokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a widespread, complex, and multi-system hormonal disorder that occurs in women of reproductive age. The wide variation in practice in the treatment of PCOS is a direct consequence of the lack of sufficient evidence on alternative treatment strategies, as well as a poor understanding of the disorder itself. The aim of our systematic review was to assess the therapeutic advantages and adverse effects of metformin (MET), a standard treatment modality, with myoinositol (MI), a recent substitute that may be used alone or in combination with other remedies to treat PCOS. A literature search was done using PubMed Central, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Studies were limited to those published in English between 2012 and 2022 that focused on the management of PCOS with both MET and MI. The systematic review complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Using standard quality assessment tools, two reviewers independently assessed the content of the incorporated studies. Three meta-analyses, eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and one non-randomized non-controlled trial (NN-RCT) were deemed eligible. Following extensive analysis, we found that MET and MI are comparable in their effects on clinical, hormonal, and biochemical profiles. MI, however, had a better safety profile and tolerance due to minimal side effects compared to MET. These results demonstrate the potential role of MI as a novel asset in the armamentarium in the management of PCOS.

Indexed as

inositolmetforminmyoinositolpcospolycystic ovary syndromestein-leventhal syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37575860
PMCPMC10421410
OpenAlexW4384037829

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.