Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37576078›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023

Efficacy and safety of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist macitentan in epicardial and microvascular vasospasm; a proof-of-concept study.

Rutger G T Feenstra, Tijn P J Jansen, S Matthijs Boekholdt, Janet E Brouwer, Margriet I Klees, Yolande Appelman, Marianne E Wittekoek, Tim P van de Hoef, Robbert J de Winter, Jan J Piek and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of enrolment criteria and treatment efficacy for microvascular angina.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Molecular Mechanisms Governing Vascular Function in Heart Failure.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Recent highlights on coronary artery disease from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rutger G T FeenstraAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tijn P J JansenDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
S Matthijs BoekholdtAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Janet E BrouwerAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Margriet I KleesAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yolande AppelmanAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marianne E WittekoekCardiology, HeartLife Clinics, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Tim P van de HoefDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Robbert J de WinterAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan J PiekAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter DammanDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marcel A M BeijkAmsterdam UMC, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment of patients diagnosed with angina due to epicardial or microvascular coronary artery spasm (CAS) is challenging because patients often remain symptomatic despite conventional pharmacological therapy. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cross-over proof-of-concept study, we compared the efficacy and safety of macitentan, a potent inhibitor of the endothelin-1 receptor, to placebo in symptomatic patients with CAS despite background pharmacological treatment. Methods: Patients with CAS diagnosed by invasive spasm provocation testing with >3 anginal attacks per week despite pharmacological treatment were considered for participation. Participants received either 10 mg of macitentan or placebo daily for 28 days as add-on treatment. After a wash-out period patients were crossed over to the alternate treatment arm. The primary endpoint was the difference in anginal burden calculated as [1] the duration (in minutes) * severity (on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scale 1-10); and [2] the frequency of angina attacks * severity during medication use compared to the run-in phase. Results: 28 patients of whom 22 females (79%) and a mean age of 55.3 ± 7.6 completed the entire study protocol (epicardial CAS n = 19 (68), microvascular CAS n = 9 (32)). Change in both indices of anginal burden were not different during treatment with add-on macitentan as compared to add-on placebo (duration*severity: -9 [-134 78] vs -45 [-353 11], p = 0.136 and frequency*severity: -1.7 [-5.8 1.2] vs -1.8 [-6.2 0.3], p = 0.767). The occurrence and nature of self-reported adverse events were closely similar between the treatment phase with macitentan and placebo. Conclusion: In patients with angina due to epicardial or microvascular CAS despite background pharmacological treatment, 28 days of add-on treatment with the ET-1 receptor antagonist, macitentan 10 mg daily, did not reduce anginal burden compared to add-on treatment with placebo.Trial Registrationhttps://trialsearch.who.int/, Identifier: EUCTR2018-002623-42-NL. Registration date: 20 February 2019.

Indexed as

Coronary artery spasmMacitentanMicrovascular anginaProof of conceptVasospastic angina

Identifiers

PMID37576078
PMCPMC10422675
OpenAlexW4384450948

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.