ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023
NeuroCNN_GNB: an ensemble model to predict neuropeptides based on a convolution neural network and Gaussian naive Bayes.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding Neuropeptide Complexity: Advancing Neurobiological Insights from Invertebrates to Vertebrates through Evolutionary Perspectives.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Review
- Article
- Computational approaches for identifying neuropeptides: A comprehensive review.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting early neurological deterioration in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- iNP_ESM: Neuropeptide Identification Based on Evolutionary Scale Modeling and Unified Representation Embedding Features.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Construction of a risk prediction model for lung infection after chemotherapy in lung cancer patients based on the machine learning algorithm.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- SRPNet: stroke risk prediction based on two-level feature selection and deep fusion network.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropeptides contain more chemical information than other classical neurotransmitters and have multiple receptor recognition sites. These characteristics allow neuropeptides to have a correspondingly higher selectivity for nerve receptors and fewer side effects. Traditional experimental methods, such as mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography technology, still need the support of a complete neuropeptide precursor database and the basic characteristics of neuropeptides. Incomplete neuropeptide precursor and information databases will lead to false-positives or reduce the sensitivity of recognition. In recent years, studies have proven that machine learning methods can rapidly and effectively predict neuropeptides. In this work, we have made a systematic attempt to create an ensemble tool based on four convolution neural network models. These baseline models were separately trained on one-hot encoding, AAIndex, G-gap dipeptide encoding and word2vec and integrated using Gaussian Naive Bayes (NB) to construct our predictor designated NeuroCNN_GNB. Both 5-fold cross-validation tests using benchmark datasets and independent tests showed that NeuroCNN_GNB outperformed other state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, this novel framework provides essential interpretations that aid the understanding of model success by leveraging the powerful Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) algorithm, thereby highlighting the most important features relevant for predicting neuropeptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.