Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37577598›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Methods for decoding cortical gradients of functional connectivity.

Julio A Peraza, Taylor Salo, Michael C Riedel, Katherine L Bottenhorn, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Jérôme Dockès, James D Kent, Jessica E Bartley, Jessica S Flannery, Lauren D Hill-Bowen and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Julio A PerazaDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3816-5903
Taylor SaloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-3167
Michael C RiedelLTI Engineering and Software, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1860-4449
Katherine L BottenhornDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7796-8795
Jean-Baptiste PolineDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-749X
Jérôme DockèsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-2496
James D KentDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4892-2659
Jessica E BartleyDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-9701
Jessica S FlanneryDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3274-1578
Lauren D Hill-BowenDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9817-7757
Rosario Pintos LoboDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7679-1385
Ranjita PoudelDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4343-1153
Kimberly L RayDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1302-2834
Jennifer L RobinsonDepartment of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7389-3047
Robert W LairdDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Matthew T SutherlandDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6091-4037
Alejandro de la VegaDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-3778
Angela R LairdDepartment of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-8744
Florida International University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USMcGill University · CAAuburn University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
FIU-ABCD: Pathways and Mechanisms to Addiction in the Latino Youth of South FloridaU01DA041156 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez, Angela R Laird · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Yaroslav O Halchenko · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Large-scale meta-analysis of functional MRI dataR01MH096906 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alejandro De La Vega · 2012 to 2026
$7.9M
Neuroimaging meta-analytics for addiction: Nodes, networks,and new heuristicsR01DA041353 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI LAIRD, ANGELA R, SUTHERLAND, MATTHEW T · 2017 to 2019
$645k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041353NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041156NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096906NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroscale gradients have emerged as a central principle for understanding functional brain organization. Previous studies have demonstrated that a principal gradient of connectivity in the human brain exists, with unimodal primary sensorimotor regions situated at one end and transmodal regions associated with the default mode network and representative of abstract functioning at the other. The functional significance and interpretation of macroscale gradients remains a central topic of discussion in the neuroimaging community, with some studies demonstrating that gradients may be described using meta-analytic functional decoding techniques. However, additional methodological development is necessary to fully leverage available meta-analytic methods and resources and quantitatively evaluate their relative performance. Here, we conducted a comprehensive series of analyses to investigate and improve the framework of data-driven, meta-analytic methods, thereby establishing a principled approach for gradient segmentation and functional decoding. We found that a two-segment solution determined by a k-means segmentation approach and an LDA-based meta-analysis combined with the NeuroQuery database was the optimal combination of methods for decoding functional connectivity gradients. Finally, we proposed a method for decoding additional components of the gradient decomposition. The current work aims to provide recommendations on best practices and flexible methods for gradient-based functional decoding of fMRI data.

Indexed as

fMRIfunctional connectivityfunctional decodinggradientsmeta-analysismeta-analytic decoding

Identifiers

PMID37577598
PMCPMC10418206
OpenAlexW4385520931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.