Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37578736›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023

Nature of the Interaction of Alpha-D-Mannose and Escherichia coli Bacteria, and Implications for its Regulatory Classification. A Delphi Panel European Consensus Based on Chemistry and Legal Evidence.

Francesco Scaglione, Paola Minghetti, Francesco Ambrosio, Beat Ernst, Vincenzo Ficarra, Marco Gobbi, Kurt Naber, Huub Schellekens

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Francesco ScaglioneClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit -GOM Niguarda, GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy. francesco.scaglione@unimi.it.
Paola MinghettiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Via Mangiagalli 25, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Francesco AmbrosioBureau Veritas Group, Via Santa Brigida, 39, 80133, Napoli, Italy.
Beat ErnstGroup Molecular Pharmacy Pharmacenter, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Vincenzo FicarraDepartment of Human and Pediatric Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Urologic Section, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti, 1, Messina, Italy.
Marco GobbiLaboratory of Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri, 2, 20156, Milan, MI, Italy.
Kurt NaberDepartment of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Huub SchellekensFaculty of Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80125, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITBureau Veritas (Italy) · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature of alpha-D-mannose-natural aldohexose sugar, C-2 glucose epimer, whose intended use is for preventing urinary tract infections-in the interaction with E. coli is addressed in order to drive the issue of its regulatory classification as a medicinal product or medical device. PRISMA systematic review approach was applied; Delphi Panel method was used to target consensus on statements retrieved from evidence. Based on regulatory definitions and research evidence, the mechanism of D-mannose does not involve a metabolic or immunological action while there is uncertainty regarding the pharmacological action. Specific interaction between the product and the bacteria within the body occurs, but its nature is inert: it does not induce a direct response activating or inhibiting body processes. Moreover, the action of D-mannose takes place, even if inside the bladder, outside the epithelium on bacteria that have not yet invaded the urothelial tissue. Therefore, its mechanism of action is not directed to host structures but to structures (bacteria) external to the host's tissues. On the basis of current regulation, the uncertainty as regard a pharmacological action of alpha-D-mannose makes possible its medical device classification: new regulations and legal judgments can add further considerations. From a pharmacological perspective, research is driven versus synthetic mannosides: no further considerations are expected on alpha-D-mannose.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliMannoseAdhesins, Escherichia coliFimbriae ProteinsSystematic Reviews as TopicAdhesins, Escherichia coliFimbriae ProteinsMannoseDelphi consensusD-mannoseFimH adhesinProduct classificationUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID37578736
PMCPMC10579141
OpenAlexW4385798985

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.