Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37579152›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Automating hybrid collective intelligence in open-ended medical diagnostics.

Ralf H J M Kurvers, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese, Alessandro Russo, Gioele Barabucci, Stefan M Herzog, Vito Trianni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Individual incentives that promote collective intelligence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Human-AI collectives most accurately diagnose clinical vignettes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. AI-enhanced collective intelligence.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Collective Intelligence Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in a General Practice Setting.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Automating hybrid collective intelligence in open-ended medical diagnostics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ralf H J M KurversCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin 14191, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3460-0392
Andrea Giovanni NuzzoleseSemantic Technology Laboratory & Collective Intelligence in Natural and Artificial Systems Laboratory, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome 00185, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2928-9496
Alessandro RussoSemantic Technology Laboratory & Collective Intelligence in Natural and Artificial Systems Laboratory, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome 00185, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-9437-0249
Gioele BarabucciNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7034, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-0111
Stefan M HerzogCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin 14191, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-6433
Vito TrianniSemantic Technology Laboratory & Collective Intelligence in Natural and Artificial Systems Laboratory, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome 00185, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9114-8486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective intelligence has emerged as a powerful mechanism to boost decision accuracy across many domains, such as geopolitical forecasting, investment, and medical diagnostics. However, collective intelligence has been mostly applied to relatively simple decision tasks (e.g., binary classifications). Applications in more open-ended tasks with a much larger problem space, such as emergency management or general medical diagnostics, are largely lacking, due to the challenge of integrating unstandardized inputs from different crowd members. Here, we present a fully automated approach for harnessing collective intelligence in the domain of general medical diagnostics. Our approach leverages semantic knowledge graphs, natural language processing, and the SNOMED CT medical ontology to overcome a major hurdle to collective intelligence in open-ended medical diagnostics, namely to identify the intended diagnosis from unstructured text. We tested our method on 1,333 medical cases diagnosed on a medical crowdsourcing platform: The Human Diagnosis Project. Each case was independently rated by ten diagnosticians. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of single diagnosticians with the collective diagnosis of differently sized groups, we find that our method substantially increases diagnostic accuracy: While single diagnosticians achieved 46% accuracy, pooling the decisions of ten diagnosticians increased this to 76%. Improvements occurred across medical specialties, chief complaints, and diagnosticians' tenure levels. Our results show the life-saving potential of tapping into the collective intelligence of the global medical community to reduce diagnostic errors and increase patient safety.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingIntelligenceDiagnostic ErrorsHumanscollective intelligencegeneral medical diagnosticsnatural language processingontology

Identifiers

PMID37579152
PMCPMC10450668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.