ArticleGenome research2023
Dissecting and improving gene regulatory network inference using single-cell transcriptome data.
Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial Omics.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026Review
- A single-cell multimodal view on gene regulatory network inference from transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Approaches for Benchmarking Single-Cell Gene Regulatory Network Methods.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptome data has been widely used to reconstruct gene regulatory networks (GRNs) controlling critical biological processes such as development and differentiation. Although a growing list of algorithms has been developed to infer GRNs using such data, achieving an inference accuracy consistently higher than random guessing has remained challenging. To address this, it is essential to delineate how the accuracy of regulatory inference is limited. Here, we systematically characterized factors limiting the accuracy of inferred GRNs and demonstrated that using pre-mRNA information can help improve regulatory inference compared to the typically used information (i.e., mature mRNA). Using kinetic modeling and simulated single-cell data sets, we showed that target genes' mature mRNA levels often fail to accurately report upstream regulatory activities because of gene-level and network-level factors, which can be improved by using pre-mRNA levels. We tested this finding on public single-cell RNA-seq data sets using intronic reads as proxies of pre-mRNA levels and can indeed achieve a higher inference accuracy compared to using exonic reads (corresponding to mature mRNAs). Using experimental data sets, we further validated findings from the simulated data sets and identified factors such as transcription factor activity dynamics influencing the accuracy of pre-mRNA-based inference. This work delineates the fundamental limitations of gene regulatory inference and helps improve GRN inference using single-cell RNA-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.