Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580527›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Caenorhabditis elegans foraging patterns follow a simple rule of thumb.

Gabriel Madirolas, Alid Al-Asmar, Lydia Gaouar, Leslie Marie-Louise, Andrea Garza-Enríquez, Valentina Rodríguez-Rada, Mikail Khona, Martina Dal Bello, Christoph Ratzke, Jeff Gore and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. eLife · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. On collective behavior inFrontiers in neurorobotics · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gabriel Madirolas *Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR5169), Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, 31062, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-4507
Alid Al-Asmar *Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR5169), Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, 31062, France.
Lydia GaouarCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR5169), Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, 31062, France.
Leslie Marie-LouiseCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR5169), Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, 31062, France.
Andrea Garza-EnríquezCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR5169), Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, 31062, France.
Valentina Rodríguez-RadaCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR5169), Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, 31062, France.
Mikail KhonaPhysics of Living Systems Group, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Martina Dal BelloPhysics of Living Systems Group, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3706-2929
Christoph RatzkePhysics of Living Systems Group, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeff GorePhysics of Living Systems Group, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4583-8555
Alfonso Pérez-EscuderoCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR5169), Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, 31062, France. alfonso.perez.escudero@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-6139

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rules of thumb are behavioral algorithms that approximate optimal behavior while lowering cognitive and sensory costs. One way to reduce these costs is by simplifying the representation of the environment: While the theoretically optimal behavior may depend on many environmental variables, a rule of thumb may use a smaller set of variables that performs reasonably well. Experimental proof of this simplification requires an exhaustive mapping of all relevant combinations of several environmental parameters, which we performed for Caenorhabditis elegans foraging by covering systematically combinations of food density (across 4 orders of magnitude) and food type (across 12 bacterial strains). We found that worms' response is dominated by a single environmental variable: food density measured as number of bacteria per unit surface. They disregard other factors such as biomass content or bacterial strain. We also measured experimentally the impact on fitness of each type of food, determining that the rule is near-optimal and therefore constitutes a rule of thumb that leverages the most informative environmental variable. These results set the stage for further investigations into the underlying genetic and neural mechanisms governing this simplification process, and into its role in the evolution of decision-making strategies.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansAnimalsBacteriaFeeding Behavior

Identifiers

PMID37580527
PMCPMC10425387

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.