ArticleJACC. Advances2023
Assessment and Management of Older Adults Undergoing PCI, Part 1: A
Article in JACC. Advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravascular imaging vs. angiography alone to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Coronary artery disease · 2026Pooled it
- Complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in older adults with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Pooled it
- Invasive Versus Conservative Strategy in Older Adults ≥75 Years of Age With Non-ST-segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Shorter Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Older Adults After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Disease in Adults ≥ 75 versus < 75 Years.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Baseline Dementia Prevalence and Subtypes in Older Adults Hospitalized With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Multicenter Study From a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
- NSTEMI in the oldest-old: prognosis and impact of invasive management in patients ≥ 85 years.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Very Elderly Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection: detection, management, and prevention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative Performance of Calcium-Modification Strategies for Coronary Lesions: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Revascularization in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Use of Cangrelor in Türkiye: A Multicenter Real-Life Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Re-evaluating stress testing paradigms in older adults.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025Article
- Post-percutaneous coronary intervention psychological disorders predict poor adherence and cardiovascular events in elderly heart failure patients.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Antithrombotic Therapy in the Elderly with Cardiovascular Disease: Walking the Tightrope Between Efficacy and Bleeding Risk-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mechanisms to Restore Function and Clinical Impact.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Beyond Longevity: Prioritizing Individualized Care in Older Adults With NSTE-ACS.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Models to Estimate the Incident Risk of Cognitive Impairment and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Association of age with adverse events following coronary atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As the population ages, older adults represent an increasing proportion of patients referred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Older adults are the highest-risk group for morbidity and mortality, particularly after complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. Structured risk assessment plays a key role in differentiating patients who are likely to derive net benefit vs those who have disproportionate risks for harm. Conventional risk assessment tools from national cardiovascular societies typically rely on 3 pillars: 1) cardiovascular risk; 2) physiologic and hemodynamic risk; and 3) anatomic and procedural risks. We propose adding a fourth pillar: geriatric syndromes, as geriatric domains can supersede all other aspects of risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.