Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37585562›Full record

ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2023

Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems.

Aleksandra Szwed-Georgiou, Przemysław Płociński, Barbara Kupikowska-Stobba, Mateusz M Urbaniak, Paulina Rusek-Wala, Konrad Szustakiewicz, Paweł Piszko, Agnieszka Krupa, Monika Biernat, Małgorzata Gazińska and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aleksandra Szwed-GeorgiouDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-136, Poland.
Przemysław PłocińskiDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-136, Poland.
Barbara Kupikowska-StobbaBiomaterials Research Group, Lukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Krakow 31-983, Poland.
Mateusz M UrbaniakDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-136, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2800-2054
Paulina Rusek-WalaDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-136, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-4710
Konrad SzustakiewiczDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw 50-370, Poland.
Paweł PiszkoDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-8509
Agnieszka KrupaDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-136, Poland.
Monika BiernatBiomaterials Research Group, Lukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Krakow 31-983, Poland.
Małgorzata GazińskaDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw 50-370, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2972-7620
Mirosław KasprzakBiomaterials Research Group, Lukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Krakow 31-983, Poland.
Katarzyna NawrotekFaculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz 90-924, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6371-2257
Nuno Pereira MiraiBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7556-0385
Karolina RudnickaDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-136, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel tissue regeneration strategies are constantly being developed worldwide. Research on bone regeneration is noteworthy, as many promising new approaches have been documented with novel strategies currently under investigation. Innovative biomaterials that allow the coordinated and well-controlled repair of bone fractures and bone loss are being designed to reduce the need for autologous or allogeneic bone grafts eventually. The current engineering technologies permit the construction of synthetic, complex, biomimetic biomaterials with properties nearly as good as those of natural bone with good biocompatibility. To ensure that all these requirements meet, bioactive molecules are coupled to structural scaffolding constituents to form a final product with the desired physical, chemical, and biological properties. Bioactive molecules that have been used to promote bone regeneration include protein growth factors, peptides, amino acids, hormones, lipids, and flavonoids. Various strategies have been adapted to investigate the coupling of bioactive molecules with scaffolding materials to sustain activity and allow controlled release. The current manuscript is a thorough survey of the strategies that have been exploited for the delivery of biomolecules for bone regeneration purposes, from choosing the bioactive molecule to selecting the optimal strategy to synthesize the scaffold and assessing the advantages and disadvantages of various delivery strategies.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringBone and BonesBone RegenerationPeptidesBiocompatible MaterialsPeptidesbioactive materialsbiomaterialsbiomolecule delivery systemsbiomoleculesbone healingbone regenerationcompositesscaffolds

Identifiers

PMID37585562
PMCPMC10498424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.