Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37586867›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Pain related to intravitreal injections for age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients and practitioners.

Christina Yiallouridou, Jennifer H Acton, Sanjiv Banerjee, Heather Waterman, Ashley Wood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina YiallouridouSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Jennifer H ActonSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-7651
Sanjiv BanerjeeOphthalmology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Heather WatermanHealthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Ashley WoodSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK WoodA2@Cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9312-6184
Cardiff University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOcular pain is a commonly reported finding in the intravitreal injection procedure, but post-injection experiences and patient adherence to treatment remain underexplored. We therefore aimed to identify key variations in the intravitreal injection procedure that may influence pain, and to gain insights into the post-injection experience and treatment adherence from the perspective of patients and practitioners.

designQualitative semistructured interview study using reflexive thematic analysis of transcripts.

settingHospital Eye Clinic in Wales, UK. Interviews were conducted between May and September 2019.

participantsPurposive sample of patients aged ≥50 years with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and no other retinal pathology who had received at least six intravitreal injections, and practitioners including ophthalmologists, registered nurses and optometrists who performed intravitreal injections at the research site.

resultsData saturation was reached with 21 interviews: 14 patients and 7 practitioners. Three main themes were identified from the analysis: fear of losing eyesight and treatment anxiety influence patient adherence to treatment, variability in pain experience during treatment, and post-injection experience and impact on patient recovery. To reassure patients feeling apprehensive about the injections, practitioners promoted safety and trust, and used techniques to manage anxiety. Key variations that may influence pain identified were application of antiseptic or anaesthetic, injecting methods and communication. During injection, patients reported a dull-aching and sharp pain, contrary to practitioners' perspective of feeling a 'pressure'. Patients described prolonged soreness and irritation of up to 36 hours post-injection affecting their sleep and recovery.

conclusionEstablishing rapport supported patients to recognise the necessity of ongoing treatment to prevent sight loss; however, inadequate pain management led to undesirable outcomes. Practitioners should use pain assessment tools during and immediately after injection and provide ongoing consistent information to help patients manage pain at home.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationAnxietyEmotionsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPainOPHTHALMOLOGYPAIN MANAGEMENTQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID37586867
PMCPMC10432642
OpenAlexW4385863763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.