ArticleScientific reports2023
Expression status of circ-SMARCA5, circ-NOL10, circ-LDLRAD3, and circ-RHOT1 in patients with colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysregulation of circ-SMARCA5, circ-RHOT1, and HNF1A and the association of HNF1A polymorphisms with hepatocellular carcinoma.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Intervention of machine learning in bladder cancer research using multi-omics datasets: systematic review on biomarker identification.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Exploring the diagnostic potential of plasma circ-CCDC66 in colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CircRNAs in Colorectal Cancer: Unveiling Their Roles and Exploring Therapeutic Potential.Biochemical genetics · 2025Review
- Molecular mechanisms of circular RNA in breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2024Review
- circ_0006988 promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion through miRNA-92a-2-5p/TFAP4 axis.Epigenomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant burden on both the healthcare systems as well as individuals. The high mortality rate of CRC may be attributed to its metastatic potential, heterogeneity, and delayed diagnosis. CircRNAs are an essential class of regulatory RNAs that play significant roles in cancers. This study aimed to detect the expression status of circ-SMARCA5, circ-NOL10, circ-LDLRAD3, and circ-RHOT1 in patients with CRC. This study included 50 CRC patients, 30 individuals with colorectal diseases (non-cancer), and 20 healthy volunteers. By using real-time PCR, the relative expression of circ-SMARCA5, circ-NOL10, circ-LDLRAD3, and circ-RHOT1 was determined in the collected blood samples. In addition, ECLIA was used to quantify carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. All circRNAs expression and CEA levels were significantly up-regulated in cancer patients (CRC, colon, rectum) as compared to healthy controls, except circ-SMARCA5. Moreover, there was a significant up-regulation of circRNAs in most non-cancer patients (UC, polyp, piles). Insignificant upregulation was observed in circRNAs and CEA when comparing cancer with non-cancer patients. No correlations were found between the studied parameters and most clinicopathological characteristics of cancer and non-cancer patients. Circ-SMARCA5, circ-NOL10, circ-LDLRAD3, and circ-RHOT1 were differentially expressed in patients with CRC as well as in non-cancer patients. Circ-SMARCA5 and circ-NOL10 may act as tumor suppressors, while circ-LDLRAD3 and circ-RHOT1 may be oncogenes. Circ-SMARCA5, circ-NOL10, circ-LDLRAD3, and circ-RHOT1 could be promising markers for the early detection of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.