Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37587290›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2024

Drug delivery methods for cancer immunotherapy.

Edgar Pérez-Herrero, Olivia L Lanier, Neha Krishnan, Abby D'Andrea, Nicholas A Peppas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edgar Pérez-HerreroDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. eperezhe@ull.edu.es.
Olivia L LanierDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Neha KrishnanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Abby D'AndreaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Nicholas A PeppasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the fact that numerous immunotherapy-based drugs have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of primary and metastatic tumors, only a small proportion of the population can benefit from them because of primary and acquired resistances. Moreover, the translation of immunotherapy from the bench to the clinical practice is being challenging because of the short half-lives of the involved molecules, the difficulties to accomplish their delivery to the target sites, and some serious adverse effects that are being associated with these approaches. The emergence of drug delivery vehicles in the field of immunotherapy is helping to overcome these difficulties and limitations and this review describes how, providing some illustrative examples. Moreover, this article provides an exhaustive review of the studies that have been published to date on the particular case of hematological cancers. (Created with BioRender).

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsCancerDrug deliveryHematologic cancersHydrogelsImmunotherapyNanocarriers

Identifiers

PMID37587290
PMCPMC10746770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.