ArticleScientific reports2023
Application of artificial intelligence in endoscopic image analysis for the diagnosis of a gastric cancer pathogen-Helicobacter pylori infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- CurrentJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Rapid diagnosis ofFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- [Risks and benefits of artificial intelligence in luminal endoscopy].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic diagnosis system for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Upper Gastrointestinal Diagnosis.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing gastroenterology and hepatology with artificial intelligence: From precision diagnosis to equitable healthcare through interdisciplinary practice.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: A Narrative Review.The Ulster medical journal · 2025Article
- Article
- The artificial intelligence revolution in gastric cancer management: clinical applications.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancers: Diagnostic, prognostic, and surgical strategies.Cancer letters · 2025Review
- Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the general population in Wuzhou, China: a cross-sectional study.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Abdominal Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Exploring the immune escape mechanisms in gastric cancer patients based on the deep AI algorithms and single-cell sequencing analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in gastroscopy: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Review
- Use of artificial intelligence for the detection ofAnnals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the principal cause of chronic gastritis, gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, and gastric cancer. In clinical practice, diagnosis of H. pylori infection by a gastroenterologists' impression of endoscopic images is inaccurate and cannot be used for the management of gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence classification system for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection by pre-processing endoscopic images and machine learning methods. Endoscopic images of the gastric body and antrum from 302 patients receiving endoscopy with confirmation of H. pylori status by a rapid urease test at An Nan Hospital were obtained for the derivation and validation of an artificial intelligence classification system. The H. pylori status was interpreted as positive or negative by Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Concurrent Spatial and Channel Squeeze and Excitation (scSE) network, combined with different classification models for deep learning of gastric images. The comprehensive assessment for H. pylori status by scSE-CatBoost classification models for both body and antrum images from same patients achieved an accuracy of 0.90, sensitivity of 1.00, specificity of 0.81, positive predictive value of 0.82, negative predicted value of 1.00, and area under the curve of 0.88. The data suggest that an artificial intelligence classification model using scSE-CatBoost deep learning for gastric endoscopic images can distinguish H. pylori status with good performance and is useful for the survey or diagnosis of H. pylori infection in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.