Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596544›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Complete mitochondrial genome of Agrostis stolonifera: insights into structure, Codon usage, repeats, and RNA editing.

Jiaxing Li, Yinglong Chen, Yaling Liu, Chen Wang, Ling Li, Yuehui Chao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheGenes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors affecting the genetic diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mitochondrial Genome Insights into Evolution and Gene Regulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. The complete mitochondrial genomes ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  17. The complete mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiaxing LiSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Yinglong ChenUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia.
Yaling LiuInner Mongolia M-Grass Ecology And Environment (Group) Co., Ltd, Hohhot, 010010, China.
Chen WangMentougou District Bureau of Ecological and Environment of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, 102300, China.
Ling LiMentougou District Bureau of Ecological and Environment of Beijing Municipality, Beijing, 102300, China.
Yuehui ChaoSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. chaoyuehui@bjfu.edu.cn.
Beijing Forestry University · CNBeijing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau · CNThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

The major demonstration project of "The open competition" for seed Industry science and technology innovation in Inner Mongolia 2022JBGS00160302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlants possess mitochondrial genomes that are large and complex compared to animals. Despite their size, plant mitochondrial genomes do not contain significantly more genes than their animal counterparts. Studies into the sequence and structure of plant mitochondrial genomes heavily imply that the main mechanism driving replication of plant mtDNA, and offer valuable insights into plant evolution, energy production, and environmental adaptation.

resultsThis study presents the first comprehensive analysis of Agrostis stolonifera's mitochondrial genome, characterized by a branched structure comprising three contiguous chromosomes, totaling 560,800 bp with a GC content of 44.07%. Annotations reveal 33 unique protein-coding genes (PCGs), 19 tRNA genes, and 3 rRNA genes. The predominant codons for alanine and glutamine are GCU and CAA, respectively, while cysteine and phenylalanine exhibit weaker codon usage biases. The mitogenome contains 73, 34, and 23 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) on chromosomes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Chromosome 1 exhibits the most frequent A-repeat monomeric SSR, whereas chromosome 2 displays the most common U-repeat monomeric SSR. DNA transformation analysis identifies 48 homologous fragments between the mitogenome and chloroplast genome, representing 3.41% of the mitogenome's total length. The PREP suite detects 460 C-U RNA editing events across 33 mitochondrial PCGs, with the highest count in the ccmFn gene and the lowest in the rps7 gene. Phylogenetic analysis confirms A. stolonifera's placement within the Pooideae subfamily, showing a close relationship to Lolium perenne, consistent with the APG IV classification system. Numerous homologous co-linear blocks are observed in A. stolonifera's mitogenomes and those of related species, while certain regions lack homology.

conclusionsThe unique features and complexities of the A. stolonifera mitochondrial genome, along with its similarities and differences to related species, provide valuable insights into plant evolution, energy production, and environmental adaptation. The findings from this study significantly contribute to the growing body of knowledge on plant mitochondrial genomes and their role in plant biology.

Indexed as

AgrostisGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsCodon UsagePhylogenyRNA EditingA. stoloniferaMitochondrial genomeRepeat-mediated recombinationRNA editing events

Identifiers

PMID37596544
PMCPMC10439588
OpenAlexW4385978344

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.