Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37598265›Full record

ArticleISME communications2023

Comparative genomics unveils extensive genomic variation between populations of Listeria species in natural and food-associated environments.

Jingqiu Liao, Xiaodong Guo, Shaoting Li, Sai Manohar Balu Anupoju, Rachel A Cheng, Daniel L Weller, Genevieve Sullivan, Hailong Zhang, Xiangyu Deng, Martin Wiedmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jingqiu LiaoDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. liaoj@vt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2579-8157
Xiaodong GuoDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Shaoting LiSchool of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Sai Manohar Balu AnupojuDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Rachel A ChengDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Daniel L WellerDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7259-6331
Genevieve SullivanDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Hailong ZhangDepartment of Business Information Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Xiangyu DengCenter for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, USA.
Martin WiedmannDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-5662
Cornell University · USVirginia Tech · USGuangdong University of Technology · CNUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehending bacterial genomic variation linked to distinct environments can yield novel insights into mechanisms underlying differential adaptation and transmission of microbes across environments. Gaining such insights is particularly crucial for pathogens as it benefits public health surveillance. However, the understanding of bacterial genomic variation is limited by a scarcity of investigations in genomic variation coupled with different ecological contexts. To address this limitation, we focused on Listeria, an important bacterial genus for food safety that includes the human pathogen L. monocytogenes, and analyzed a large-scale genomic dataset collected by us from natural and food-associated environments across the United States. Through comparative genomics analyses on 449 isolates from the soil and 390 isolates from agricultural water and produce processing facilities representing L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri, L. innocua, and L. welshimeri, we find that the genomic profiles strongly differ by environments within each species. This is supported by the environment-associated subclades and differential presence of plasmids, stress islands, and accessory genes involved in cell envelope biogenesis and carbohydrate transport and metabolism. Core genomes of Listeria species are also strongly associated with environments and can accurately predict isolation sources at the lineage level in L. monocytogenes using machine learning. We find that the large environment-associated genomic variation in Listeria appears to be jointly driven by soil property, climate, land use, and accompanying bacterial species, chiefly representing Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. Collectively, our data suggest that populations of Listeria species have genetically adapted to different environments, which may limit their transmission from natural to food-associated environments.

Identifiers

PMID37598265
PMCPMC10439904
OpenAlexW4385999809

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.