ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2023
Clinical Performance Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Reporting.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- CGM Accuracy in a Fragmented Regulatory Landscape: A Commentary on Harmonisation and Recent Evidence.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors in Exercise Research Studies-A Scoping Review on Study Characteristics and Common Practices.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital diagnostics, biomarkers and therapeutics in an evolving healthcare system: From promise to practice.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Decision accuracy of simultaneously used real-time CGM versus intermittently scanned CGM around exercise in type 1 diabetes: A secondary analysis of the ULTRAFLEXI-1 study.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- International clinical opinion on transparency, standardisation, and calibration alignment in the performance evaluation of systems for continuous glucose monitoring.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
- Challenges of Wearable Biosensors and Ways to Overcome Them.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics Between Prediabetes and Normoglycemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Review
- Performance of a New Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in German Adults Living with Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Accuracy and feasibility of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in early postoperative intensive care after liver transplantation.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Hypoglycemia Management in Long-Term Care: Lessons Learned From a Pilot Quality Improvement Initiative Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Continuous glucose monitoring systems for adolescents and adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Review
- Accuracy and Reliability of the Sinocare Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Article
- Continuous glucose monitoring system in diabetes in pregnancy: a narrative review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Accuracy of Glucose Trends by Subcutaneous Continuous Monitoring vs Intermittent Arterial Measurements in Critically Ill Patients.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
- Consensus statement on standardizing CGM evaluation metrics in Latin America: an expert approach.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Comparative Performance Analysis of Manual and Updated Optional Calibration Algorithms for the CareSens Air CGM System.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
- How to compare algorithms for automated insulin delivery using different sensors?Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Minimum expectations for market authorization of continuous glucose monitoring devices in Europe-'eCGM' compliance status.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Towards Standardization of CGM Performance Studies: The QUSS-CGM Questionnaire for Assessing User Satisfaction.Patient related outcome measures · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of different approaches for design and results presentation of studies for the clinical performance evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems has long been recognized as a major challenge in comparing their results. However, a comprehensive characterization of the variability in study designs is currently unavailable. This article presents a scoping review of clinical CGM performance evaluations published between 2002 and 2022. Specifically, this review quantifies the prevalence of numerous options associated with various aspects of study design, including subject population, comparator (reference) method selection, testing procedures, and statistical accuracy evaluation. We found that there is a large variability in nearly all of those aspects and, in particular, in the characteristics of the comparator measurements. Furthermore, these characteristics as well as other crucial aspects of study design are often not reported in sufficient detail to allow an informed interpretation of study results. We therefore provide recommendations for reporting the general study design, CGM system use, comparator measurement approach, testing procedures, and data analysis/statistical performance evaluation. Additionally, this review aims to serve as a foundation for the development of a standardized CGM performance evaluation procedure, thereby supporting the goals and objectives of the Working Group on CGM established by the Scientific Division of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.