Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600784›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

An attenuated herpesvirus vectored vaccine candidate induces T-cell responses against highly conserved porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus M and NSP5 proteins that are unable to control infection.

Rory C F de Brito, Kerry Holtham, Jessica Roser, Jack E Saunders, Yvonne Wezel, Summer Henderson, Thekla Mauch, Beatriz Sanz-Bernardo, Jean-Pierre Frossard, Matthieu Bernard and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rory C F de BritoThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Kerry HolthamThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Jessica RoserThe Vaccine Group Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Jack E SaundersThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Yvonne WezelThe Vaccine Group Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Summer HendersonThe Vaccine Group Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Thekla MauchThe Vaccine Group Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Beatriz Sanz-BernardoECO Animal Health, London, United Kingdom.
Jean-Pierre FrossardVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Matthieu BernardPathology and Animal Sciences Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Fabian Z X LeanPathology and Animal Sciences Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Alejandro NunezPathology and Animal Sciences Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Simon GubbinsThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Nicolás M SuárezMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew J DavisonMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Michael J FrancisBioVacc Consulting Ltd., Amersham, United Kingdom.
Michael HuetherECO Animal Health, London, United Kingdom.
Hafid BenchaouiECO Animal Health, London, United Kingdom.
Jeremy SaltThe Vaccine Group Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Veronica L FowlerECO Animal Health, London, United Kingdom.
Michael A JarvisThe Vaccine Group Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Simon P GrahamThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
The Pirbright Institute · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBMRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007031Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007038Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) remains a leading cause of economic loss in pig farming worldwide. Existing commercial vaccines, all based on modified live or inactivated PRRSV, fail to provide effective immunity against the highly diverse circulating strains of both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop more effective and broadly active PRRSV vaccines. In the absence of neutralizing antibodies, T cells are thought to play a central role in controlling PRRSV infection. Herpesvirus-based vectors are novel vaccine platforms capable of inducing high levels of T cells against encoded heterologous antigens. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the immunogenicity and efficacy of an attenuated herpesvirus-based vector (bovine herpesvirus-4; BoHV-4) expressing a fusion protein comprising two well-characterized PRRSV-1 T-cell antigens (M and NSP5). Prime-boost immunization of pigs with BoHV-4 expressing the M and NSP5 fusion protein (vector designated BoHV-4-M-NSP5) induced strong IFN-γ responses, as assessed by ELISpot assays of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) stimulated with a pool of peptides representing PRRSV-1 M and NSP5. The responses were closely mirrored by spontaneous IFN-γ release from unstimulated cells, albeit at lower levels. A lower frequency of M and NSP5 specific IFN-γ responding cells was induced following a single dose of BoHV-4-M-NSP5 vector. Restimulation using M and NSP5 peptides from PRRSV-2 demonstrated a high level of cross-reactivity. Vaccination with BoHV-4-M-NSP5 did not affect viral loads in either the blood or lungs following challenge with the two heterologous PRRSV-1 strains. However, the BoHV-4-M-NSP5 prime-boost vaccination showed a marked trend toward reduced lung pathology following PRRSV-1 challenge. The limited effect of T cells on PRRSV-1 viral load was further examined by analyzing local and circulating T-cell responses using intracellular cytokine staining and proliferation assays. The results from this study suggest that vaccine-primed T-cell responses may have helped in the control of PRRSV-1 associated tissue damage, but had a minimal, if any, effect on controlling PRRSV-1 viral loads. Together, these results indicate that future efforts to develop effective PRRSV vaccines should focus on achieving a balanced T-cell and antibody response.

Indexed as

Herpesvirus VaccinesImmunogenicity, VaccinePorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusViral Matrix ProteinsViral Nonstructural ProteinsAnimalsGenetic VectorsSwineT-LymphocytesVaccines, AttenuatedHerpesvirus VaccinesM protein, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusVaccines, AttenuatedViral Matrix ProteinsViral Nonstructural Proteinsbovine herpesvirus 4immunogenicityporcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusprotective efficacyT cellvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37600784
PMCPMC10436000
OpenAlexW4385520367

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.