ReviewInterventional cardiology (London, England)2023
Invasive Detection of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: How It Began, and Where We Are Now.
Review in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Coronary Flow Reserve in Adults: Pathophysiology, Assessment Modalities, Clinical Applications, and Prognostic Significance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Bridging the Diagnosis-Treatment Divide in Women with INOCA-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Angiographic Microvascular Resistance Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Invasive Physiological Assessment of Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Myocardial contrast echocardiography evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction to Predict MACEs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction follow-up.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Assessing the Impact of Prolonged Averaging of Coronary Continuous Thermodilution Traces.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The landscape of interventional cardiology is ever evolving. Contemporary practice has shifted from a stenosis-centred approach to the total characterisation of both the epicardial and microcirculatory vessels. Microcirculatory dysfunction plays an important role in the pathophysiology of acute and chronic coronary syndromes, and characterisation of the microcirculation has important clinical consequences. Accordingly, the invasive diagnosis of microcirculatory dysfunction is becoming a key feature of the interventional cardiologist's toolkit. This review focuses on the methodology underpinning the invasive diagnosis of microvascular dysfunction and highlights the indices that have arisen from these methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.