ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2023
Unmet needs in Barret's esophagus diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic mapping of registered interventional studies addressing the top 10 research priorities in Barrett's oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: This narrative review discusses Barrett's esophagus management in the context of perceived deficiencies or controversies. Barrett's adenocarcinoma incidence has not clearly been impacted by Barrett's screening and surveillance. Methods: The following report was derived from articles using PubMed and Google searches. The search was concentrated on Barrett's esophagus screening and management guidelines. Key Content and Findings: Comprehensive literature searches that highlight potential deficiencies or controversies regarding the current approach to Barrett's esophagus were employed. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence is rapidly increasing and this malignancy usually presents in an advanced and unresectable state. This is despite the significant expenditure of resources and time in endoscopic screening for and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. Thus, more widespread screening for Barrett's esophagus may be considered. In addition, there are apparent inefficiencies and precision lack in the performance of endoscopic surveillance. This relates mainly to the lack of endoscopic cues for dysplasia. On the other hand, relatively low-risk subjects have frequent screening or surveillance procedures increasing cost. Lastly, endoscopic ablation for Barrett's with dysplasia has moderately good efficacy, especially for eradication of dysplasia, but mandates intensive post-therapy endoscopic surveillance. There is some concern for subsurface development of advanced Barrett's lesions. Fortunately, there is intense research in improving Barrett's esophagus diagnosis and treatment. Our narrative review will delineate deficiencies and potential measures to remedy them. Conclusions: In conclusion, screening for Barrett's esophagus and surveillance in Barrett's subjects have minimal established benefits, but proposed changes in screening practices and innovations in Barrett's esophagus endoscopic surveillance and dysplasia therapy have great promise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.