ArticleOman journal of ophthalmology
Optical coherence tomography predictors of the outcomes of occlusion therapy in anisometropic amblyopia.
Article in Oman journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aim(1) To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes in patients presenting with anisometropic amblyopia. (2) To find OCT factors predicting the outcomes of occlusion therapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective study was conducted in a tertiary eye care center for a period of 20 months. Fifty-four children diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopic were included in the study. After complete ophthalmic and OCT examination, patients were advised to undergo occlusion therapy with large spectacle patch. Patients were reviewed after 6 months to record improvement in visual acuity and analyze their OCT parameters. Statistical tests used were paired "
resultsThe mean age of 54 study patients was 9.24 ± 2.82 years. For comparison of OCT parameters, they were classified as myopic (22 patients), hypermetropic (24 patients), and astigmatic (8 patients) groups. In the anisomyopic amblyopia group, the mean inner macular thickness was significantly increased in fellow eyes (304.09 ± 11.06 μm) compared to amblyopic eyes (297.59 ± 14.16 μm). In the anisohyperopic amblyopia group, the outer macular thickness significantly increased in amblyopic eyes (286.43 ± 18.63 μm) when compared to fellow eyes (272.62 ± 14.90 μm). In the follow-up visit, 28 patients showed improvement and 6 patients did not show improvement in final best-corrected visual acuity, and the OCT parameters in amblyopic eyes of these two groups did not differ significantly.
conclusionAbnormal experience in early life does not affect the maturation process of retinal layers as evident by OCT parameters, and these parameters cannot predict the outcomes of occlusion therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.