Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37604983›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2024

The sex gap in bladder cancer survival - a missing link in bladder cancer care?

Paul Toren, Anna Wilkins, Keval Patel, Amy Burley, Typhaine Gris, Roger Kockelbergh, Taha Lodhi, Ananya Choudhury, Richard T Bryan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul TorenCHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5762-5787
Anna WilkinsDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Keval PatelUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Amy BurleyDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Typhaine GrisCHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-8184
Roger KockelberghUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-3628
Taha LodhiDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6891-0866
Ananya ChoudhuryDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Richard T BryanAction Bladder Cancer UK, Tetbury, UK. r.t.bryan@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-4293
Institute of Cancer Research · GBUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Manchester · GBCancer Research UK · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differences in bladder cancer outcomes between the sexes has again been highlighted. Uncommon among cancers, bladder cancer outcomes are notably worse for women than for men. Furthermore, bladder cancer is three to four times more common among men than among women. Factors that might explain these sex differences include understanding the importance of haematuria as a symptom of bladder cancer by both clinicians and patients, the resultant delays in diagnosis and referral of women with haematuria, and health-care access. Notably, these factors seem to have geographical variation and are not consistent across all health-care systems. Likewise, data relating to sex-specific treatment responses for patients with non-muscle-invasive or muscle-invasive bladder cancer are inconsistent. The influence of differences in the microbiome, bladder wall thickness and urine dwell times remain to be elucidated. The interplay of hormone signalling, gene expression, immunology and the tumour microenvironment remains complex but probably underpins the sexual dimorphism in disease incidence and stage and histology at presentation. The contribution of these biological phenomena to sex-specific outcome differences is probable, albeit potentially treatment-specific, and further understanding is required. Notwithstanding these aspects, we identify opportunities to harness biological differences to improve treatment outcomes, as well as areas of fundamental and translational research to pursue. At the level of policy and health-care delivery, improvements can be made across the domains of patient awareness, clinician education, referral pathways and guideline-based care. Together, we aim to highlight opportunities to close the sex gap in bladder cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

Urinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsFemaleHematuriaHumansMaleSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37604983
OpenAlexW4386026568

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.