ReviewNature reviews. Urology2024
The sex gap in bladder cancer survival - a missing link in bladder cancer care?
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A plasma derived hypoxia signature predicts benefit from hypoxia-modifying radiotherapy and reveals dynamic humoral immune modulation in bladder cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Urinary bladder cancer needs more attention - recommendations for health care professionals and politicians in the European Union.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Sex disparities in bladder cancer diagnosis: evidence from the UK Biobank.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Testosterone and Androgen Receptor in Cancers with Significant Sex Dimorphism in Incidence Rates and Survival.Cancers · 2025Review
- Decoding SIGLEC12 in Bladder Cancer: In Silico Profiling of Expression, Tumor-Immune Interactions, and Prognostic Impact.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Neolactotetraosylceramide enables urinary detection of bladder cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Tracing the Evolution of Sex Hormones and Receptor-Mediated Immune Microenvironmental Differences in Prostate and Bladder Cancers: From Embryonic Development to Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Exploring of bladder cancer immune-related genes and potential therapeutic targets based on transcriptomic data and Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Impact of Age, TNM Stage, and Hospitalization on Bladder Cancer Survival: Evidence from a Hospital-Based Cohort in Eastern China.Research and reports in urology · 2025Article
- Gender difference of bladder cancer: insights from hormone, anatomy and tumor microenvironment.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Article
- In silico analysis of overall survival with YBX1 in male and female solid tumours.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The differences in bladder cancer outcomes between the sexes has again been highlighted. Uncommon among cancers, bladder cancer outcomes are notably worse for women than for men. Furthermore, bladder cancer is three to four times more common among men than among women. Factors that might explain these sex differences include understanding the importance of haematuria as a symptom of bladder cancer by both clinicians and patients, the resultant delays in diagnosis and referral of women with haematuria, and health-care access. Notably, these factors seem to have geographical variation and are not consistent across all health-care systems. Likewise, data relating to sex-specific treatment responses for patients with non-muscle-invasive or muscle-invasive bladder cancer are inconsistent. The influence of differences in the microbiome, bladder wall thickness and urine dwell times remain to be elucidated. The interplay of hormone signalling, gene expression, immunology and the tumour microenvironment remains complex but probably underpins the sexual dimorphism in disease incidence and stage and histology at presentation. The contribution of these biological phenomena to sex-specific outcome differences is probable, albeit potentially treatment-specific, and further understanding is required. Notwithstanding these aspects, we identify opportunities to harness biological differences to improve treatment outcomes, as well as areas of fundamental and translational research to pursue. At the level of policy and health-care delivery, improvements can be made across the domains of patient awareness, clinician education, referral pathways and guideline-based care. Together, we aim to highlight opportunities to close the sex gap in bladder cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.