Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608069›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Lymphomas in children and adolescents].

Wolfram Klapper

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wolfram KlapperInstitut für Pathologie, Sektion Hämatopathologie und Lymphknotenregister, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus U33, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. wklapper@path.uni-kiel.de.
Kiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphomas in children and adolescents differ from adulthood in relative frequency and variety of entities. In addition, young patients are cared for according to the specific standards of pediatric lymphoma study groups.

objectiveTo present lymphomas of diagnostic and clinical relevance in the pediatric and adolescent group. MATERIAL AND

methodsSelective literature research ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ) was combined with clinico-pathological experience of the authors.

resultsChildren and adolescents are much more likely to suffer from aggressive and precursor cell lymphoma than is the case in adulthood. Unlike adult patients, Burkitt lymphomas and diffuse large B‑cell lymphomas are not treated fundamentally differently. Entities that have been described relatively recently and are particularly common in young patients are high-grade B‑cell lymphoma with 11q aberrations and large-cell B‑cell lymphoma with IRF4 translocations.

conclusionLymphoma diagnosis in children and adolescents is characterized by the particular spectrum of diseases that occur at this age. Special knowledge about the clinical relevance of the diagnoses in childhood is helpful in order to enable rapid clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Burkitt LymphomaLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdolescentAdultChildChromosome AberrationsGene RearrangementHumansTranslocation, GeneticAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaBurkitt lymphomaDiffuse large B‑cell lymphomaEpstein-Barr virus infectionHodgkin lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID37608069
OpenAlexW4386055228

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.