Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37608126›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2024

Glycaemic control and insulin therapy are significant confounders of the obesity paradox in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus.

Hanna Fröhlich, Anna Bossmeyer, Syed Kazmi, Kevin M Goode, Stefan Agewall, Dan Atar, Morten Grundtvig, Norbert Frey, John G F Cleland, Lutz Frankenstein and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hanna FröhlichDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna BossmeyerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Syed KazmiHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Kevin M GoodeHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Stefan AgewallDepartment of Cardiology, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Dan AtarDepartment of Cardiology, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Morten GrundtvigMedical Department, Innlandet Hospital Trust Division Lillehammer, Lillehammer, Norway.
Norbert FreyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
John G F ClelandNational Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lutz FrankensteinDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. lutz.frankenstein@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-1004
Andrew L ClarkHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Tobias TägerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Hull · GBOslo University Hospital · NOHarefield Hospital · GBInnlandet Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA high body mass index (BMI) confers a paradoxical survival benefit in patients with heart failure (HF) or diabetes mellitus (DM). There is, however, controversy whether an obesity paradox is also present in patients with HF and concomitant DM. In addition, the influence of glycaemic control and diabetes treatment on the presence or absence of the obesity paradox in patients with HF and DM is unknown.

methodsWe identified 2936 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the HF registries of the universities of Heidelberg, Germany, and Hull, UK (general sample). Of these, 598 (20%) were treated for concomitant DM (DM subgroup). The relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality was analysed in both the general sample and the DM subgroup. Patients with concomitant DM were stratified according to HbA1c levels or type of diabetes treatment and analyses were repeated.

resultsWe found an inverse BMI-mortality relationship in both the general sample and the DM subgroup. However, the obesity paradox was less pronounced in patients with diabetes treated with insulin and it disappeared in those with poor glycaemic control as defined by HbA1c levels > 7.5%.

conclusionIn patients with HFrEF, a higher BMI is associated with better survival irrespective of concomitant DM. However, insulin treatment and poor glycaemic control make the relationship much weaker.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexGlycemic ControlHeart FailureHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinObesityRegistriesAgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusFemaleGermanyGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinDiabetes mellitusHeart failureMortalityObesity paradoxReverse epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID37608126
PMCPMC11108876
OpenAlexW4386067068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.