ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Single-molecule analysis of transcription activation: dynamics of SAGA co-activator recruitment.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription activators are said to stimulate gene expression by "recruiting" coactivators to promoters, yet this term fits several different kinetic models. To directly analyze dynamics of activator-coactivator interactions, single-molecule microscopy was used to image promoter DNA, a transcription activator, and the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex within nuclear extract. SAGA readily, but transiently, binds nucleosome-free DNA without activator, while chromatin template association occurs nearly exclusively when activator is present. On both templates, activator increases SAGA association rates by up to an order of magnitude, and dramatically extends its dwell times. These effects reflect direct interactions with the transactivation domain, as VP16 or Rap1 activation domains produce different SAGA dynamics. Despite multiple bromodomains, acetyl-CoA or histone H3/H4 tail acetylation only modestly improves SAGA binding. Unexpectedly, histone acetylation more strongly affects activator residence. Our studies thus reveal two modes of SAGA interaction with the genome: a short-lived activator-independent interaction with nucleosome-free DNA, and a state tethered to promoter-bound transcription activators that can last up to several minutes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.