ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2023
An RNA-informed dosage sensitivity map reflects the intrinsic functional nature of genes.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissue-specific gene dosage disruption is a key feature and pathogenic mechanism of structural variants in the human genome.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Nonlinear transcriptional responses to gradual modulation of transcription factor dosage.eLife · 2026Article
- Article
- Recalibrating differential gene expression by genetic dosage variance prioritizes functionally relevant genes.Genome research · 2025Article
- Nonlinear transcriptional responses to gradual modulation of transcription factor dosage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial clonal mosaicism encodes a biphasic molecular clock of aging.Nature aging · 2025Article
- RNA Sequencing in Disease Diagnosis.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding dosage sensitivity or why Mendelian diseases have dominant vs. recessive modes of inheritance is crucial for uncovering the etiology of human disease. Previous knowledge of dosage sensitivity is mainly based on observations of rare loss-of-function mutations or copy number changes, which are underpowered due to ultra rareness of such variants. Thus, the functional underpinnings of dosage constraint remain elusive. In this study, we aim to systematically quantify dosage perturbations from cis-regulatory variants in the general population to yield a tissue-specific dosage constraint map of genes and further explore their underlying functional logic. We reveal an inherent divergence of dosage constraints in genes by functional categories with signaling genes (transcription factors, protein kinases, ion channels, and cellular machinery) being dosage sensitive, while effector genes (transporters, metabolic enzymes, cytokines, and receptors) are generally dosage resilient. Instead of being a metric of functional dispensability, we show that dosage constraint reflects underlying homeostatic constraints arising from negative feedback. Finally, we employ machine learning to integrate DNA and RNA metrics to generate a comprehensive, tissue-specific map of dosage sensitivity (MoDs) for autosomal genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.