Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620034›Full record

ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2023

Collision cross section measurement and prediction methods in omics.

Kimberly Y Kartowikromo, Orobola E Olajide, Ahmed M Hamid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kimberly Y KartowikromoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5766-1528
Orobola E OlajideDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-2074
Ahmed M HamidDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-979X

Funding

Development of a Portable Ion Mobility Spectrometer For Efficient Diagnosis of Various DiseasesR35GM147225 · NIGMS · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI Ahmed Mohamed Hamid · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147225NIH HHS 1R35GM147225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omics studies such as metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics have become important for understanding the mechanisms in living organisms. However, the compounds detected are structurally different and contain isomers, with each structure or isomer leading to a different result in terms of the role they play in the cell or tissue in the organism. Therefore, it is important to detect, characterize, and elucidate the structures of these compounds. Liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry have been utilized for decades in the structure elucidation of key compounds. While prediction models of parameters (such as retention time and fragmentation pattern) have also been developed for these separation techniques, they have some limitations. Moreover, ion mobility has become one of the most promising techniques to give a fingerprint to these compounds by determining their collision cross section (CCS) values, which reflect their shape and size. Obtaining accurate CCS enables its use as a filter for potential analyte structures. These CCS values can be measured experimentally using calibrant-independent and calibrant-dependent approaches. Identification of compounds based on experimental CCS values in untargeted analysis typically requires CCS references from standards, which are currently limited and, if available, would require a large amount of time for experimental measurements. Therefore, researchers use theoretical tools to predict CCS values for untargeted and targeted analysis. In this review, an overview of the different methods for the experimental and theoretical estimation of CCS values is given where theoretical prediction tools include computational and machine modeling type approaches. Moreover, the limitations of the current experimental and theoretical approaches and their potential mitigation methods were discussed.

Indexed as

LipidomicsMetabolomicsChromatography, LiquidIsomerismMass SpectrometryCCScomputational methodsion mobilitymachine learningomics

Identifiers

PMID37620034
PMCPMC10530098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.