ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2023
Collision cross section measurement and prediction methods in omics.
Review in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of TIMS-derived peptide mobility measurements: calibration strategy and MS1/MS2 discrepancies.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Trends in Computational Metabolomics: A Perspective on Five Years of Software Development, Challenges, and Opportunities (2021-2025).Analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Metabolomics of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure: Advances in LC-MS technology and applications.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2026Review
- How to Use Quantum Chemistry for Analyzing Mass Spectrometry Data.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Development and Modification of Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation for Enhanced Analysis of Biological Molecules.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Review
- The Future of a Myriad of Accelerated Biodiscoveries Lies in AI-Powered Mass Spectrometry and Multiomics Integration.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2025Article
- Review
- Peptide Property Prediction for Mass Spectrometry Using AI: An Introduction to State of the Art Models.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Rapid and Accurate Identification of Microorganisms Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2025Article
- Identification and Structural Elucidation of Acylsugars in Tomato Leaves Using Liquid Chromatography-Ion Mobility-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-IM-MS/MS).Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Desorption Electrospray Ionization Cyclic Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Traumatic Brain Injury Spatial Metabolomics.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Predicting the Predicted: A Comparison of Machine Learning-Based Collision Cross-Section Prediction Models for Small Molecules.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Computational tools and algorithms for ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.Proteomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Omics studies such as metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics have become important for understanding the mechanisms in living organisms. However, the compounds detected are structurally different and contain isomers, with each structure or isomer leading to a different result in terms of the role they play in the cell or tissue in the organism. Therefore, it is important to detect, characterize, and elucidate the structures of these compounds. Liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry have been utilized for decades in the structure elucidation of key compounds. While prediction models of parameters (such as retention time and fragmentation pattern) have also been developed for these separation techniques, they have some limitations. Moreover, ion mobility has become one of the most promising techniques to give a fingerprint to these compounds by determining their collision cross section (CCS) values, which reflect their shape and size. Obtaining accurate CCS enables its use as a filter for potential analyte structures. These CCS values can be measured experimentally using calibrant-independent and calibrant-dependent approaches. Identification of compounds based on experimental CCS values in untargeted analysis typically requires CCS references from standards, which are currently limited and, if available, would require a large amount of time for experimental measurements. Therefore, researchers use theoretical tools to predict CCS values for untargeted and targeted analysis. In this review, an overview of the different methods for the experimental and theoretical estimation of CCS values is given where theoretical prediction tools include computational and machine modeling type approaches. Moreover, the limitations of the current experimental and theoretical approaches and their potential mitigation methods were discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.