Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620410›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Ex vivo drug sensitivity screening predicts response to temozolomide in glioblastoma patients and identifies candidate biomarkers.

Ioannis Ntafoulis, Anne Kleijn, Jie Ju, Kevin Jimenez-Cowell, Federica Fabro, Michelle Klein, Romain Tching Chi Yen, Rutger K Balvers, Yunlei Li, Andrew P Stubbs and 22 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Chemotherapy sensitivity of primary glioblastoma cells and immunohistochemical markers to predict of survival of patients with of glioblastoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Ioannis Ntafoulis *Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Anne Kleijn *Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jie JuDepartment of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kevin Jimenez-CowellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Federica FabroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Michelle KleinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Romain Tching Chi YenInformation Technologies for Translational Medicine, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Rutger K BalversDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Yunlei LiDepartment of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5697-1602
Andrew P StubbsDepartment of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Trisha V KersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Johan M KrosDepartment of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Sean E LawlerDept of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Legorreta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Laurens V BeerepootDepartment of Internal Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Andreas KremerInformation Technologies for Translational Medicine, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Ahmed IdbaihDMU Neurosciences, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Maite VerreaultInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Annette T ByrneDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-8899
Alice C O'FarrellDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Kate ConnorDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Archita BiswasDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Manuela SalvucciDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Jochen H M PrehnDepartment of Physiology and Medical Physics, Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Diether LambrechtsDepartment of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, KU Leuven, and VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-302X
Gonca DilcanDepartment of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, KU Leuven, and VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
Francesca LodiDepartment of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, KU Leuven, and VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
Ingrid ArijsDepartment of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, KU Leuven, and VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
Martin J van den BentDepartment of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5710-5127
Clemens M F DirvenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Sieger LeenstraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
GLIOTRAIN consortium
Martine L M LamfersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands. m.lamfers@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7745-9029
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLBeaumont Hospital · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEErasmus MC · NLVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRBrown University · USElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Luxembourg · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-derived glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) have become the gold-standard in neuro-oncological research; however, it remains to be established whether loss of in situ microenvironment affects the clinically-predictive value of this model. We implemented a GSC monolayer system to investigate in situ-in vitro molecular correspondence and the relationship between in vitro and patient response to temozolomide (TMZ).

methodsDNA/RNA-sequencing was performed on 56 glioblastoma tissues and 19 derived GSC cultures. Sensitivity to TMZ was screened across 66 GSC cultures. Viability readouts were related to clinical parameters of corresponding patients and whole-transcriptome data.

resultsTumour DNA and RNA sequences revealed strong similarity to corresponding GSCs despite loss of neuronal and immune interactions. In vitro TMZ screening yielded three response categories which significantly correlated with patient survival, therewith providing more specific prediction than the binary MGMT marker. Transcriptome analysis identified 121 genes related to TMZ sensitivity of which 21were validated in external datasets.

conclusionGSCs retain patient-unique hallmark gene expressions despite loss of their natural environment. Drug screening using GSCs predicted patient response to TMZ more specifically than MGMT status, while transcriptome analysis identified potential biomarkers for this response. GSC drug screening therefore provides a tool to improve drug development and precision medicine for glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkersCell Line, TumorDacarbazineDNADrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansTemozolomideTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkersDacarbazineDNATemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID37620410
PMCPMC10575865
OpenAlexW4386118429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.