Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37623752›Full record

ArticleMembranes2023

Evaluation between Biodegradable Magnesium Metal GBR Membrane and Bovine Graft with or without Hyaluronate.

Marko Blašković, Dorotea Blašković, David Botond Hangyasi, Olga Cvijanović Peloza, Matej Tomas, Marija Čandrlić, Patrick Rider, Berit Mang, Željka Perić Kačarević, Branko Trajkovski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Research status and prospects of biodegradable magnesium-based metal guided bone regeneration membranes.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marko BlaškovićDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine Rijeka, University of Rijeka, Krešimirova 40/42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Dorotea BlaškovićDental Clinic Dr. Blašković, Linićeva ulica 16, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
David Botond HangyasiDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, 1052 Budapest, Hungary.
Olga Cvijanović PelozaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Braće Branchetta 20/1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4381-8529
Matej TomasDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-3371
Marija ČandrlićDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2932-7157
Patrick RiderBotiss Biomaterials, Ullsteinstrasse 108, 12109 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3620-7199
Berit MangBotiss Biomaterials, Ullsteinstrasse 108, 12109 Berlin, Germany.
Željka Perić KačarevićDepartment of Anatomy, Embriology, Pathology and Pathohistology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8250-723X
Branko TrajkovskiFaculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat 13110, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0003-4161-5645
University of Osijek · HRUniversity of Rijeka · HRKuwait University · KWSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone substitutes and barrier membranes are widely used in dental regeneration procedures. New materials are constantly being developed to provide the most optimal surgical outcomes. One of these developments is the addition of hyaluronate (HA) to the bovine bone graft, which has beneficial wound healing and handling properties. However, an acidic environment that is potentially produced by the HA is known to increase the degradation of magnesium metal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential risk for the addition of HA to the bovine bone graft on the degradation rate and hence the efficacy of a new biodegradable magnesium metal GBR membrane. pH and conductivity measurements were made in vitro for samples placed in phosphate-buffered solutions. These in vitro tests showed that the combination of the bovine graft with HA resulted in an alkaline environment for the concentrations that were used. The combination was also tested in a clinical setting. The use of the magnesium metal membrane in combination with the tested grafting materials achieved successful treatment in these patients and no adverse effects were observed in vivo for regenerative treatments with or without HA. Magnesium based biodegradable GBR membranes can be safely used in combination with bovine graft with or without hyaluronate.

Indexed as

barrier membranebovine bone substitutehyaluronateimmediate implantationmagnesium membranemagnesium screw

Identifiers

PMID37623752
PMCPMC10456676
OpenAlexW4385273030

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.