Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37624622›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2023

Short-Term Findings From Testing EPIO, a Digital Self-Management Program for People Living With Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Katrine Bostrøm, Elin Børøsund, Hilde Eide, Cecilie Varsi, Ólöf Birna Kristjansdottir, Karlein M G Schreurs, Lori B Waxenberg, Karen E Weiss, Eleshia J Morrison, Hanne Stavenes Støle and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03705104 (Living Well with Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03705104 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Living Well with Chronic Pain: Using Person-centered E-health Design to Support Self-management

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2019 to 2030Enrolled340ConditionsChronic Pain, WidespreadArmsEPIO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katrine BostrømDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3673-8694
Elin BørøsundDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3897-7055
Hilde EideDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-5047
Cecilie VarsiDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5257-7993
Ólöf Birna KristjansdottirDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8585-5547
Karlein M G SchreursDepartment of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-0151
Lori B WaxenbergDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4987-8503
Karen E WeissDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6576-0615
Eleshia J MorrisonDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-943X
Hanne Stavenes StøleDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-6852
Milada Cvancarova SmåstuenFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8947-8649
Audun StubhaugInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0606-8001
Lise Solberg NesDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9261-0871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain conditions involve numerous physical and psychological challenges, and while psychosocial self-management interventions can be of benefit for people living with chronic pain, such in-person treatment is not always accessible. Digital self-management approaches could improve this disparity, potentially bolstering outreach and providing easy, relatively low-cost access to pain self-management interventions.

objectiveThis randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of EPIO (ie, inspired by the Greek goddess for the soothing of pain, Epione), a digital self-management intervention, for people living with chronic pain.

methodsPatients (N=266) were randomly assigned to either the EPIO intervention (n=132) or a care-as-usual control group (n=134). Outcome measures included pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory; primary outcome measure), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), self-regulatory fatigue (Self-Regulatory Fatigue 18 scale), health-related quality of life (SF-36 Short Form Health Survey), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), and pain acceptance (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire). Linear regression models used change scores as the dependent variables.

resultsThe participants were primarily female (210/259, 81.1%), with a median age of 49 (range 22-78) years and a variety of pain conditions. Analyses (n=229) after 3 months revealed no statistically significant changes for the primary outcome of pain interference (P=.84), but significant reductions in the secondary outcomes of depression (mean difference -0.90; P=.03) and self-regulatory fatigue (mean difference -2.76; P=.008) in favor of the intervention group. No other statistically significant changes were observed at 3 months (all P>.05). Participants described EPIO as useful (ie, totally agree or agree; 95/109, 87.2%) and easy to use (101/109, 92.7%), with easily understandable exercises (106/109, 97.2%).

conclusionsEvidence-informed, user-centered digital pain self-management interventions such as EPIO may have the potential to effectively support self-management and improve psychological functioning in the form of reduced symptoms of depression and improved capacity to regulate thoughts, feelings, and behavior for people living with chronic pain.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705104; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03705104.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSelf-ManagementAdultAgedFatigueFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPain ManagementQuality of LifeYoung Adultacceptance and commitment therapychronic paincognitive behavioral therapydigital healthefficacyself-management

Identifiers

PMID37624622
PMCPMC10492177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.