Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626125›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2023

A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of liraglutide on self-reported liking and neural responses to food stimuli in participants with obesity.

Géraldine Coppin, David Muñoz Tord, Eva R Pool, Loïc Locatelli, Amal Achaibou, Asli Erdemli, Laura León Pérez, Lavinia Wuensch, Donato Cereghetti, Alain Golay and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Géraldine CoppinSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. geraldine.coppin@unidistance.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-3298
David Muñoz TordSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-8295
Eva R PoolSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Loïc LocatelliDivision of endocrinology, diabetes, nutrition and therapeutic patient education, WHO Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amal AchaibouSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Asli ErdemliSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laura León PérezSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lavinia WuenschSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Donato CereghettiSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alain GolayDivision of endocrinology, diabetes, nutrition and therapeutic patient education, WHO Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
David SanderSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Zoltan PatakyDivision of endocrinology, diabetes, nutrition and therapeutic patient education, WHO Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8720-3833
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesObesity is a complex condition and the mechanisms involved in weight gain and loss are not fully understood. Liraglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, has been demonstrated to successfully promote weight loss in patients with obesity (OB). Yet, it is unclear whether the observed weight loss is driven by an alteration of food liking. Here we investigated the effects of liraglutide on food liking and the cerebral correlates of liking in OB. SUBJECTS/

methodsThis study was a randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, prospective clinical trial. 73 participants with OB and without diabetes following a multidisciplinary weight loss program, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive liraglutide 3.0 mg (37.40 ± 11.18 years old, BMI = 35.89 ± 3.01 kg) or a placebo (40.04 ± 14.10 years old, BMI = 34.88 ± 2.87 kg) subcutaneously once daily for 16 weeks. INTERVENTIONS/

methodsWe investigated liking during food consumption. Participants reported their hedonic experience while consuming a high-calorie food (milkshake) and a tasteless solution. The solutions were administered inside the scanner with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-compatible gustometer to assess neural responses during consumption. The same procedure was repeated during the pre- and post-intervention sessions.

resultsNone of the effects involving the intervention factor reached significance when comparing liking between the pre- and post-intervention sessions or groups. Liking during food reward consumption was associated with the activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the amygdala. The liraglutide group lost more weight (BMI post-pre = -3.19 ± 1.28 kg/m

conclusionsThese results suggest that liraglutide leads to weight loss without self-report or neural evidence supporting a concomitant reduction of food liking in participants with OB.

Indexed as

Hypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutideAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedObesityProspective StudiesSelf ReportWeight LossHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutide

Identifiers

PMID37626125
PMCPMC10663148
OpenAlexW4386162291

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.