Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626401›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2023

The RNA m6A modification might participate in microglial activation during hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in neonatal mice.

Xiaojuan Su, Lingyi Huang, Shiping Li, Junjie Ying, Fengyan Zhao, Shaopu Wang, Qian Liu, Yi Qu, Dezhi Mu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methyltransferase-Like 3-Mediated NJournal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaojuan SuDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Lingyi HuangDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Shiping LiDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Junjie YingDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Fengyan ZhaoDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Shaopu WangDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Qian LiuDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yi QuDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Dezhi MuDepartment of Pediatrics/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. mudz@scu.edu.cn.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RNA m6A modification has been implicated in multiple neurological diseases as well as macrophage activation. However, whether it regulates microglial activation during hypoxic-ischemic brain damage (HIBD) in neonates remains unknown. Here, we aim to examine whether the m6A modification is involved in modulating microglial activation during HIBD. We employed an oxygen and glucose deprivation microglial model for in vitro studies and a neonatal mouse model of HIBD. The brain tissue was subjected to RNA-seq to screen for significant changes in the mRNA m6A regulator. Thereafter, we performed validation and bioinformatics analysis of the major m6A regulators.

resultsRNA-seq analysis revealed that, among 141 m6A regulators, 31 exhibited significant differential expression (FC (abs) ≥ 2) in HIBD mice. We then subjected the major m6A regulators Mettl3, Mettl14, Fto, Alkbh5, Ythdf1, and Ythdf2 to further validation, and the results showed that all were significantly downregulated in vitro and in vivo. GO analysis reveals that regulators are mainly involved in the regulation of cellular and metabolic processes. The KEGG results indicate the involvement of the signal transduction pathway.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that m6A modification of mRNA plays a crucial role in the regulation of microglial activation in HIBD, with m6A-associated regulators acting as key modulators of microglial activation.

Indexed as

Macrophage ActivationMicrogliaAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBrainMiceRNA, MessengerRNA, MessengerHypoxia–ischemia brain damagem6A modificationMicroglia activationRNA m6A regulatorsRNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37626401
PMCPMC10463984
OpenAlexW4386162740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.