ReviewCells2023
An Update on Nucleolar Stress: The Transcriptional Control of Autophagy.
Review in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ribosome biogenesis in osteoarthritis: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- A nucleolar stress gene signature enables quantitative scoring across multi-omics contexts.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Ribosome Biogenesis and Translational Control in Skeletal Muscle Atrophy and Hypertrophy: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- MMTV-like Viruses and Human Breast Cancer: Evidence for Causality.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- The intrinsic properties of mRNAs define their translation efficiency at ribosome shortage.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Remodeling of Regulatory Regions by Indicaxanthin Suggests a Shift in Cell Identity Programs in Colorectal Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Molecular Pathways Associated with Cervical Artery Dissection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- WD Repeat Domain 5 Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy: Not What You Think.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- New Insights into Dyskerin-CypA Interaction: Implications for X-Linked Dyskeratosis Congenita and Beyond.Genes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleolar stress reflects a misfunction of the nucleolus caused by a failure in ribosome biogenesis and defective nucleolar architecture. Various causes have been reported, most commonly mutation of ribosomal proteins and ribosome processing factors, as well as interference with these processes by intracellular or ectopic stress, such as RNA polymerase I inhibition, ROS, UV and others. The nucleolus represents the place for ribosome biogenesis and serves as a crucial hub in the cellular stress response. It has been shown to stimulate multiple downstream consequences, interfering with cell growth and survival. Nucleolar stress induction is most classically known to stimulate p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Nucleolar stress represents a friend and enemy at the same time: From a pathophysiological perspective, inactivation of the nucleolar function by mutation or stress conditions is connected to multiple diseases, such as neurodegeneration, cancer and ribosomopathy syndromes. However, triggering the nucleolar stress response via specific chemotherapeutics, which interfere with nucleolar function, has beneficial effects for anti-cancer therapy. Interestingly, since the nucleolar stress response also triggers p53-independent mechanisms, it possesses the potential to specifically target p53-mutated tumors, which reflects the most common aberration in human cancer. More recent data have shown that the nucleolar stress response can activate autophagy and diverse signaling cascades that might allow initial pro-survival mechanisms. Nevertheless, it depends on the situation whether the cells undergo autophagy-mediated apoptosis or survive, as seen for autophagy-dependent drug resistance of chemotherapy-exposed tumor cells. Given the relatively young age of the research field, precise mechanisms that underly the involvement of autophagy in nucleolar stress are still under investigation. This review gives an update on the emerging contribution of nucleolar stress in the regulation of autophagy at a transcriptional level. It also appears that in autophagy p53-dependent as well as -independent responses are induced. Those could be exploited in future therapies against diseases connected to nucleolar stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.