Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627059›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Avatar-Based Strategies for Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

Irene Rodríguez-Guidonet, Paula Andrade-Pino, Carlos Monfort-Vinuesa, Esther Rincon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irene Rodríguez-GuidonetPsycho-Technology Lab, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, 28005 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5794-6679
Paula Andrade-PinoPsycho-Technology Lab, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, 28005 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-037X
Carlos Monfort-VinuesaPsycho-Technology Lab, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, 28005 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0621-8321
Esther RinconPsycho-Technology Lab, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, 28005 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7932-4643
Universidad San Pablo CEU · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of studies to determine if avatar-based protocols could be considered an efficient and accurate strategy to improve psychological well-being in oncology patients, even though it represents a growing field of research. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review addressing the effectiveness of avatar-based treatments to enhance quality of life (QoL) and psychological well-being in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to review the scientific literature of those studies involving avatar-based technology and breast cancer patients in order to answer the following questions. (1) Are avatar-based strategies useful to im-prove QoL and psychological well-being (anxiety and depression symptoms) in breast cancer patients? (2) Which is the best way to develop avatar-based protocols for breast cancer patients? We conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature from EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS), following the PRISMA statements and using "avatar + breast cancer" or "avatar + cancer" as keywords. Studies which were published in either English or Spanish and which addressed QoL and psychological well-being in breast cancer patients were reviewed. The results will contribute to developing innovative avatar-based strategies focused on breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

avatarbreast cancerquality of lifewell-being

Identifiers

PMID37627059
PMCPMC10452070
OpenAlexW4385697476

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.