Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627190›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Advances in the Radiological Evaluation of and Theranostics for Glioblastoma.

Grayson W Hooper, Shehbaz Ansari, Jason M Johnson, Daniel T Ginat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: CT vs MRI.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grayson W HooperLandstuhl Regional Medical Center, 66849 Landstuhl, Germany.
Shehbaz AnsariRush University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1319-6319
Jason M JohnsonDepartment of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-5784
Daniel T GinatDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3301-4364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging is essential for evaluating patients with glioblastoma. Traditionally a multimodality undertaking, CT, including CT cerebral blood profusion, PET/CT with traditional fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (

Indexed as

CTGBMglioblastomagliomahigh-grade gliomaMRIPETradiomicstheranostics

Identifiers

PMID37627190
PMCPMC10453051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.