Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37628594›Full record

ReviewGenes2023

CRISPR-Cas: 'The Multipurpose Molecular Tool' for Gene Therapy and Diagnosis.

Stéphane Sauvagère, Christian Siatka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Alzheimer's Disease: A Molecular Model and Implied Path to Improved Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stéphane SauvagèreEcole de l'ADN, 19 Grand Rue, 30000 Nîmes, France.
Christian SiatkaUPR CHROME, Place Gabriel PERI, 30000 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8619-3672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of the CRISPR-Cas engineering system in 2012, several approaches for using this innovative molecular tool in therapeutic strategies and even diagnosis have been investigated. The use of this tool requires a global approach to DNA damage processes and repair systems in cells. The diversity in the functions of various Cas proteins allows for the use of this technology in clinical applications and trials. Wide variants of Cas12 and Cas13 are exploited using the collateral effect in many diagnostic applications. Even though this tool is well known, its use still raises real-world ethical and regulatory questions.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic TherapyDNA DamageTechnologyCRISPR-Casdiagnosisgene therapygenetic diseasesmolecular tool

Identifiers

PMID37628594
PMCPMC10454384

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.