ReviewGenes2023
A Comprehensive Report of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Inherited Retinal Diseases.
Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A New Anatomy of Autophagic Clearance: On the Roles of Intrinsic Disorder in the Membrane-Less on Membrane-Encapsulated Mechanism.Membranes · 2026Review
- Assessing variant effect predictors and disease mechanisms in intrinsically disordered proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Revealing Molecular Diagnosis With Whole Exome Sequencing in Patients With Inherited Retinal Disorders.Clinical genetics · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics-Based Comparative Analysis of the Human Retina Proteome.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2025Article
- Intrinsic Disorder and Phase Separation Coordinate Exocytosis, Motility, and Chromatin Remodeling in the Human Acrosomal Proteome.Proteomes · 2025Article
- Next-generation phenotyping of inherited retinal diseases from multimodal imaging with Eye2Gene.Nature machine intelligence · 2025Article
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of >3500 Patients with Inherited Retinal Disease from the United Kingdom.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background/purposeA comprehensive review of the degree of disorder in all genes in the Retinal Information Network (RetNet) Database is implicated in inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). Their association with a missense variation was evaluated.
methodsIRD genes from RetNet were included in this study. Publicly available data on the genome aggregation database (gnomAD) were used to analyze the number of total and pathogenic missense variants. Metapredict, an accurate and high-performance predictor that reproduces consensus disorder scores, was used to calculate disorder.
main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were percent disorder, percent pathogenicity, number of total missense variants, and percent total missense variation.
resultsWe included 287 RetNet genes with relevant data available from gnomAD. Mean percent disorder was 26.3% ± 26.0%, mean percent pathogenicity was 5.2% ± 11.0%, mean number of total missense variants was 424.4 ± 450.0, and mean percent total missense was 50.0% ± 13.4%. The percent disorder followed a bimodal distribution with the highest number of occurrences in the 0 to 10th disorder decile. The five outlier proteins in the first disorder decile with a higher-than-expected number of total missense variation were identified (HMCN1, ADGRV, USH2A, DYNC2H1, LAMA1, and SLC38A8). When excluded, % total missense was significantly associated with percent disorder (R = 0.238 and
conclusionsThis novel study examining all genes implicated in IRDs found that the majority genes had a disorder in the 0 to 10th decile and were relatively intolerant to missense variation. This may have future utility when interpreting variants of undetermined significance and missense variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.