Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37629014›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Endothelial Cell Response to Combined Photon or Proton Irradiation with Doxorubicin.

Teresa Bernardo, Anna Kuntze, Diana Klein, Feline Heinzelmann, Beate Timmermann, Cläre von Neubeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa BernardoDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-3709-8537
Anna KuntzeGerhard Domagk Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Diana KleinInstitute of Cell Biology (Cancer Research), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1770-443X
Feline HeinzelmannWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), 45147 Essen, Germany.
Beate TimmermannDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Cläre von NeubeckDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-1626
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEGerman Cancer Society · DETU Dortmund University · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are essential treatment modalities to target cancer cells, but they frequently cause damage to the normal tissue, potentially leading to side effects. As proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) can precisely spare normal tissue, this therapeutic option is of increasing importance regarding (neo-)adjuvant and definitive anti-cancer therapies. Akin to photon-based radiotherapy, PBT is often combined with systemic treatment, such as doxorubicin (Dox). This study compares the cellular response of human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1) following irradiation with photons (X) or protons (H) alone and also in combination with different sequences of Dox. The cellular survival, cell cycle, apoptosis, proliferation, viability, morphology, and migration were all investigated. Dox monotreatment had minor effects on all endpoints. Both radiation qualities alone and in combination with longer Dox schedules significantly reduced clonogenic survival and proliferation, increased the apoptotic cell fraction, induced a longer G2/M cell cycle arrest, and altered the cell morphology towards endothelial-to-mesenchymal-transition (EndoMT) processes. Radiation quality effects were seen for metabolic viability, proliferation, and motility of HMEC-1 cells. Additive effects were found for longer Dox schedules. Overall, similar effects were found for H/H-Dox and X/X-Dox. Significant alterations between the radiation qualities indicate different but not worse endothelial cell damage by H/H-Dox.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsProtonsDoxorubicinG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansPhotonsDoxorubicinProtonsadditive effectscell survivalcombined treatmentdoxorubicinendothelial cellsmigrationproliferationproton beam radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37629014
PMCPMC10454477
OpenAlexW4385877271

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.