Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632541›Full record

ArticlePlanta2023

How do barley plants with impaired photosynthetic light acclimation survive under high-light stress?

Monireh Saeid Nia, Louis Scholz, Adriana Garibay-Hernández, Hans-Peter Mock, Urska Repnik, Jennifer Selinski, Karin Krupinska, Wolfgang Bilger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monireh Saeid NiaInstitute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Louis ScholzInstitute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Adriana Garibay-HernándezLeibniz Institute for Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Hans-Peter MockLeibniz Institute for Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Urska RepnikCentral Microscopy, Department of Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Jennifer SelinskiInstitute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Karin KrupinskaInstitute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Wolfgang BilgerInstitute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany. wbilger@bot.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7800-4210
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DELeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · DEUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KR1350/19-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionWHIRLY1 deficient barley plants surviving growth at high irradiance displayed increased non-radiative energy dissipation, enhanced contents of zeaxanthin and the flavonoid lutonarin, but no changes in α-tocopherol nor glutathione. Plants are able to acclimate to environmental conditions to optimize their functions. With the exception of obligate shade plants, they can adjust their photosynthetic apparatus and the morphology and anatomy of their leaves to irradiance. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Golden Promise) plants with reduced abundance of the protein WHIRLY1 were recently shown to be unable to acclimatise important components of the photosynthetic apparatus to high light. Nevertheless, these plants did not show symptoms of photoinhibition. High-light (HL) grown WHIRLY1 knockdown plants showed clear signs of exposure to excessive irradiance such as a low epoxidation state of the violaxanthin cycle pigments and an early light saturation of electron transport. These responses were underlined by a very large xanthophyll cycle pool size and by an increased number of plastoglobules. Whereas zeaxanthin increased with HL stress, α-tocopherol, which is another lipophilic antioxidant, showed no response to excessive light. Also the content of the hydrophilic antioxidant glutathione showed no increase in W1 plants as compared to the wild type, whereas the flavone lutonarin was induced in W1 plants. HPLC analysis of removed epidermal tissue indicated that the largest part of lutonarin was presumably located in the mesophyll. Since lutonarin is a better antioxidant than saponarin, the major flavone present in barley leaves, it is concluded that lutonarin accumulated as a response to oxidative stress. It is also concluded that zeaxanthin and lutonarin may have served as antioxidants in the WHIRLY1 knockdown plants, contributing to their survival in HL despite their restricted HL acclimation.

Indexed as

FlavonesHordeumAcclimatizationalpha-TocopherolAntioxidantsGlutathioneZeaxanthinsalpha-TocopherolAntioxidantsFlavonesGlutathioneZeaxanthinsExcess excitation energyLutonarinNPQTocopherolsWHIRLY1Zeaxanthin

Identifiers

PMID37632541
PMCPMC10460368
OpenAlexW4386190227

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.