Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632974›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2023

Distinguishing Gender Identity From Biological Sex in Dermatologic Health Care: Methods, Harms, and Paths Forward.

Noah N Nigro, Neal Chandnani, Athena Doshi, Alexa Fritsch, Nathaniel A Marroquin, Morgan Zueger, Torunn E Sivesind, Robert Dellavalle, Cory Dunnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noah N Nigro *Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8592-1767
Neal ChandnaniDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1643-2368
Athena DoshiRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0108-5722
Alexa FritschRocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-7190
Nathaniel A MarroquinRocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9472-8067
Morgan ZuegerRocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8457-931X
Torunn E SivesindDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4805-0632
Robert DellavalleDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-088X
Cory DunnickDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-1693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assessment of gender identity and biological sex in dermatology research is crucial since their conflation or poor demarcation undermines patient respect and study accuracy. Clearer guidance is needed for health care researchers, particularly in light of the notable disparities in skin disease rates, skincare practices, literature representation, and the persistent underrepresentation of transgender and nonbinary patients.

Indexed as

biological sexcommunication strategiesdermatologic healthdermatologygender assessmentsgender differences in healthgender identityhealth care questionnaireshealthcare questionnairesliterature representationsex-gender biasskincare

Identifiers

PMID37632974
PMCPMC10394595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.