Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37636090›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Shrikant Sharma, Martin Friberg, Paul Vogel, Helle Turesson, Niklas Olsson, Mariette Andersson, Per Hofvander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shrikant SharmaDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Martin FribergDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Paul VogelDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Helle TuressonDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Niklas OlssonDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Mariette AnderssonDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Per HofvanderDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reserve starch from seeds and tubers is a crucial plant product for human survival. Much research has been devoted to quantitative and qualitative aspects of starch synthesis and its relation to abiotic factors of importance in agriculture. Certain aspects of genetic factors and enzymes influencing carbon assimilation into starch granules remain elusive after many decades of research. Starch phosphorylase (Pho) can operate, depending on metabolic conditions, in a synthetic and degradative pathway. The plastidial form of the enzyme is one of the most highly expressed genes in potato tubers, and the encoded product is imported into starch-synthesizing amyloplasts. We identified that the genomic locus of a Pho1a-type starch phosphorylase is duplicated in potato. Our study further shows that the enzyme is of importance for a normal starch granule phenotype in tubers. Null mutants created by genome editing display rounded starch granules in an increased number that contained a reduced ratio of apparent amylose in the starch.

Indexed as

CRISPRgene editingpotatoreserve starchsink tissuestarch granulestarch phosphorylasetuber

Identifiers

PMID37636090
PMCPMC10450146
OpenAlexW4385729224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.