Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37637112›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

A sweet new set of inducible and constitutive promoters in

Theopi Rados, Katherine Andre, Micaela Cerletti, Alex Bisson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Establishment of the CRISPR-Cpf1 gene editing system inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Halofilins as emerging bactofilin families of archaeal cell shape plasticity orchestrators.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Promoters in Pichia pastoris: A Toolbox for Fine-Tuned Gene Expression.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Theopi RadosDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Katherine AndreDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Micaela CerlettiDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Alex BissonDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States.
Brandeis University · USNational University of Mar del Plata · AR

Funding

Predoctoral Training in Cross-Disciplinary Molecular and Cellular BiologyT32GM139798 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Paul Garrity, Bruce L Goode · 2021 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inducible promoters are one of cellular and molecular biology's most important technical tools. The ability to deplete, replete, and overexpress genes on demand is the foundation of most functional studies. Here, we developed and characterized a new xylose-responsive promoter (Pxyl), the second inducible promoter system for the model haloarcheon

Indexed as

archaeaconstitutive promotershaloarchaeaHaloferax volcaniiinducible promotersxylose-inducible promoter

Identifiers

PMID37637112
PMCPMC10448506
OpenAlexW4385724325

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.