ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Discovery of CTSK+ Periosteal Stem Cells Mediating Bone Repair in Orbital Reconstruction.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and function of periosteal skeletal stem cells in skeletal development, homeostasis, and disease.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells in craniofacial reconstruction: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the role of cathepsin K positive (CTSK+) periosteal stem cells (PSCs) in orbital bone repair and to clarify the source of endogenous stem cells for orbital bone self-repair. Methods: Periosteum samples obtained by clinical orbital bone repair surgery were analyzed, after which immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical staining were used to detect the content of bone marrow-derived cells and CTSK+ PSCs in periosteum as well as the mobilization of PSCs. CTSK+ PSCs were characterized by flow cytometry. Transcriptome sequencing was used to compare the transcriptomic characteristics of CTSK+ PSCs and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Results: The orbital periosteum contained CTSK+CD200+ cell lineage, including CD200+CD105- PSCs and CD200+CD105+ progenitor cells. CTSK and osteocalcin (OCN) colocalized in the inner layer of the orbital periosteum, suggesting the osteogenic differentiation potential of CTSK+ PSCs. CTSK expression was much higher in periosteum after mobilization. Immunofluorescence showed low amounts of scattered CD31+ and CD45+ cells in the orbital periosteum. The stem cell characteristics of CTSK+ PSCs were verified by multidirectional differentiation. Flow cytometry found CD200+CD105- CTSK+ PSCs and CD200variantCD105+ progenitor cells. Transcriptome sequencing of CTSK+ PSCs and BMSCs found 3613 differential genes with significant differences. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed the differences between the two types of stem cells, revealing that PSCs were more suitable for intramembranous osteogenesis. Conclusions: CTSK+ PSCs may be endogenous stem cells for orbital bone repair. They are mobilized after orbital fracture and have unique features suitable for intramembranous osteogenesis, completely different from BMSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.