ArticleBMJ open quality2023
No waiting lying in a corridor: a quality improvement initiative in an emergency department.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of hospital restructuring on emergency department quality: a natural experiment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Overcrowding Indicators in Emergency Departments Across Countries: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of implementing emergency department quality standards in Palestine: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Predicting emergency department admissions using a machine-learning algorithm: a proof of concept with retrospective study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Flow dynamics.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOvercrowding in the emergency department (ED) is a global problem and a source of morbidity and mortality and exhaustion for the teams. Despite multiple strategies proposed to overcome overcrowding, the accumulation of patients lying in bed awaiting treatment or hospitalisation is often inevitable and a major obstacle to quality of care. We initiated a quality improvement project with the objective of zero patients lying in bed awaiting care/referral outside a care area.
methodsSeveral plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were tested and implemented to achieve and especially maintain the goal of having zero patients waiting for care outside the ED care area. The project team introduced and adapted five rules during these cycles: (1) no patients lying down outside of a care unit; (2) forward movement; (3) examination room always available; (4) team huddle and (5) an organisation overcrowding plan.
resultsAdaptation of ED organisation in the form of PDSA cycles allowed to obtain a collective team dimension to patient flow management. Since December 2021, despite an increase in activity, no patient is placed in a lying-in waiting area outside a care zone, irrespective of their care level. Vital distress and fragile patients who need to be kept in a supine position are treated immediately. In 2022, waiting time before medical contact was <2 hours for 90% of all patients combined.
conclusionsThe PDSA strategy based on these five measures allowed to remove in-house obstacles to the internal flow of patients and to fight against their installation outside the care area. These measures are easily replicable by other management teams. Quality indicators of EDs are often heterogeneous, but we propose that the absence of patients lying on a stretcher outside a care area could be part of these indicators, and thus contribute to the improvement and safety of care provided to all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.