Evidence mapPaperPMID 37643656Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2024

Increased disparities in waitlist and post-heart transplantation outcomes according to socioeconomic status with the new heart transplant allocation system.

Catherine E Kelty, Michael G Dickinson, Marzia Leacche, Milena Jani, Nabin K Shrestha, Sangjin Lee, Deepak Acharya, Indranee Rajapreyar, Richard C Sadler, Erin McNeely and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unequal Hearts: Racial Disparities Persist in Heart Transplant Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine E KeltyCorewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Electronic address: keltyce@gmail.com.
Michael G DickinsonCorewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Marzia LeaccheCorewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Milena JaniCorewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Nabin K ShresthaCorewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Sangjin LeeCorewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Deepak AcharyaUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Indranee RajapreyarThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Richard C SadlerMichigan State University, Flint, Michigan.
Erin McNeelyMichigan State University, Flint, Michigan.
Renzo Y Loyaga-RendonCorewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Electronic address: Renzo.loyagarendon@corewellhealth.org.
Corewell HealthMichigan State University · USOrthopaedic Associates of Michigan · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK120524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study objective was to assess disparities in outcomes in the waitlist and post-heart transplantation (HT) according to socioeconomic status (SES) in the old and new U.S. HT allocation systems.

methodsAdult HT candidates in the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2014 through 2021 were included. Old or new system classification was according to listing before or after October 18, 2018. SES was stratified by patient ZIP code and median household income via U.S. Census Bureau and classified into terciles. Competing waitlist outcomes and post-transplantation survival were compared between systems.

resultsIn total, 26,450 patients were included. Waitlisted candidates with low SES were more frequently younger, female, African American, and with higher body mass index. Reduced cumulative incidence (CI) of HT in the old system occurred in low SES (53.5%) compared to middle (55.7%, p = 0.046), and high (57.9%, p < 0.001). In the new system, the CI of HT was 65.3% in the low SES vs middle (67.6%, p = 0.002) and high (70.2%, p < 0.001), and SES remained significant in the adjusted analysis. In the old system, CI of death/delisting was similar across SES. In the new system, low SES had increased CI of death/delisting (7.4%) vs middle (6%, p = 0.012) and high (5.4%, p = 0.002). The old system showed similar 1-year survival across SES. In the new system, recipients with low SES had decreased 1-year survival (p = 0.041).

conclusionsSES affects waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. In the new system, all SES had increased access to HT; however, low SES had increased death/delisting due to worsening clinical status and decreased post-transplant survival.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHeart FailureHeart TransplantationSocial ClassWaiting ListsAdultBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRetrospective Studiesallocationhealth equityheart transplantreferralsocioeconomic disparities

Identifiers

PMID37643656
PMCPMC11152116
OpenAlexW4386203042

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.