Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645467›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Drought and salinity stresses induced physio-biochemical changes in sugarcane: an overview of tolerance mechanism and mitigating approaches.

Rajeev Kumar, Vidya Sagar, Vivek Chandra Verma, Mala Kumari, Ranjit Singh Gujjar, Sanjay K Goswami, Sudhir Kumar Jha, Himanshu Pandey, Abhishek Kumar Dubey, Sangeeta Srivastava and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Adaptive Responses of Tropical Crops: A Multi-Scale Omics Integrated Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. HPlant, cell & environment · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Integrative analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rajeev KumarIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Vidya SagarIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, India.
Vivek Chandra VermaDepartment of Biochemistry, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Mala KumariIntegral Institute of Agriculture Science and Technology, Integral University, Lucknow, India.
Ranjit Singh GujjarIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Sanjay K GoswamiIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Sudhir Kumar JhaIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
Himanshu PandeyIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Abhishek Kumar DubeyIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, India.
Sangeeta SrivastavaIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
S P SinghIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Ashutosh K MallIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Ashwini Dutt PathakIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Hemlata SinghDepartment of Botany, Plant Physiology & Biochemistry, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, India.
Prakash Kumar JhaFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Sustainable Intensification, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
P V Vara PrasadFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Sustainable Intensification, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane productivity is being hampered globally under changing environmental scenarios like drought and salinity. The highly complex nature of the plant responses against these stresses is determined by a variety of factors such as genotype, developmental phase of the plant, progression rate and stress, intensity, and duration. These factors influence plant responses and can determine whether mitigation approaches associated with acclimation are implemented. In this review, we attempt to summarize the effects of drought and salinity on sugarcane growth, specifically on the plant's responses at various levels, viz., physiological, biochemical, and metabolic responses, to these stresses. Furthermore, mitigation strategies for dealing with these stresses have been discussed. Despite sugarcane's complex genomes, conventional breeding approaches can be utilized in conjunction with molecular breeding and omics technologies to develop drought- and salinity-tolerant cultivars. The significant role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in sustaining sugarcane productivity under drought and salinity cannot be overlooked.

Indexed as

abiotic stressantioxidantgenome editingomicsphotosynthesisSaccharum speciessource/sinkstomatal conductance

Identifiers

PMID37645467
PMCPMC10461627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.