Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646315›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes2024

Cardiometabolic profile of women with a history of overt diabetes compared to gestational diabetes and normoglycemia in index pregnancy: Results from CHIP-F study.

Yashdeep Gupta, Alpesh Goyal, Samita Ambekar, Mani Kalaivani, Neerja Bhatla, Nikhil Tandon

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yashdeep GuptaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-717X
Alpesh GoyalDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0922-5022
Samita AmbekarDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mani KalaivaniDepartment of Statistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Neerja BhatlaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Nikhil TandonDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-1986
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 55/4/8/CARE-YD/2018-NCD-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to evaluate the prevalence of postpartum diabetes among women with a history of overt diabetes in pregnancy (ODiP) and compare with women having a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and normoglycemia in pregnancy.

methodsWe have an established longitudinal cohort of postpartum women with a history of hyperglycemia (preexisting diabetes [PED] [n = 101], ODiP [n = 92], GDM [n = 643]), and normoglycemia (n = 183) in pregnancy. For this study, we excluded women with PED and invited other eligible women in a fasting state for clinical and biochemical evaluation.

resultsWe evaluated 918 women with a mean (SD) age of 33.6 (5.0) years and at a median (interquartile range) postpartum interval of 31 (20-45) months. Diabetes was diagnosed in 65 (70.7%) women in ODiP compared to 99 (15.4%) in GDM (p < .001) and 4 (2.2%) in normoglycemia group (p < .001). In the ODiP group, the prevalence of diabetes was 47.4% among women tested in the first year postpartum, increasing to 86.8% among women tested at >3 years postpartum. Diabetes was more common when ODiP was diagnosed in the first (27/29, 93.1%) compared to the second trimester of pregnancy (35/57, 61.4%). The adjusted odds ratio for diabetes in ODiP was 14.82 (95% confidence interval, 8.49-25.87; p < .001; reference category: GDM).

conclusionsThe prevalence of postpartum diabetes was significantly higher in women with ODiP compared to GDM. Nearly 50% of women with ODiP did not develop diabetes in the first year of follow-up, especially when ODiP was diagnosed after the first trimester of pregnancy and on the basis of a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test value. Such women are amenable to prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalPostpartum PeriodAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPrevalenceBlood Glucosediabetes in pregnancygestational diabetes mellitusovert diabetes in pregnancypostpartumSouth Asia

Identifiers

PMID37646315
PMCPMC11070837
OpenAlexW4386271982

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.