Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646902›Full record

ArticleThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2023

Role of micro-RNAs 21, 124 and other novel biomarkers in distinguishing between group 1 WHO pulmonary hypertension and group 2, 3 WHO pulmonary hypertension.

Mark O Dimitry, Youssef M A Soliman, Reem I ElKorashy, Hala M Raslan, Solaf A Kamel, Eman M Hassan, Fatma Elzahraa Ahmed, Rasha N Yousef, Eman A Awadallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark O DimitryCardiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt. mark.dimitry@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2601-235X
Youssef M A SolimanPulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Department of Pulmonology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Reem I ElKorashyPulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Department of Pulmonology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hala M RaslanCardiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Solaf A KamelDepartment of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Eman M HassanDepartment of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Fatma Elzahraa AhmedPulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Department of Pulmonology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Rasha N YousefDepartment of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Eman A AwadallahDepartment of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

National Research Centre 12060152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary hypertension "PH" is considered a serious cardiovascular disease. World Health Organization divided PH into groups depending on many factors like pathological, hemodynamic, and clinical pictures. Lately, various micro-RNAs "miRNAs" and other novel biomarkers like endoglin and asymmetric dimethylarginine "ADMA" might have a role in diagnosis of PH and may differentiate between pulmonary arterial hypertension "PAH" and non-PAH. The purpose of the study is to show the role of miR-21, miR-124, endoglin and ADMA in the diagnosis of PH and distinguishing between WHO group 1 PH and WHO group 2 and 3 PH and to identify patients who might benefit from non-invasive and inexpensive tools to diagnose PAH.

resultsmiR-21 was upregulated in group 1 PH, and there was significant difference between group 1 PH as compared with group 2 PH, group 3 PH and control; miR-124 was down-regulated in group 1 PH with highly significant difference between group 1 and group 2 PH and control but no significant difference with group 3 PH, endoglin was elevated in group 1 PH with a significant difference as compared to group 2 PH, group 3 PH and control. ADMA was elevated in group 1 PH as compared to control; however, there was no significant difference between it and group 2, 3 PH.

conclusionsmiR-21, miR-124, endoglin and ADMA are good biomarkers to diagnose PH; however, only miR-21 and endoglin could distinguish group 1 PH from group 2 and 3 PH.

Identifiers

PMID37646902
PMCPMC10468479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.