ArticleBiochemistry2023
Intrinsically Disordered Flanking Regions Increase the Affinity of a Transcriptional Coactivator Interaction across Vertebrates.
Article in Biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linker Length and Composition within Disordered Binding Motifs Modulates the Avidity and Reversibility of a Multivalent Protein Interaction Switch.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024Review
- Conservation of Affinity Rather Than Sequence Underlies a Dynamic Evolution of the Motif-Mediated p53/MDM2 Interaction in Ray-Finned Fishes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactions between two proteins are often mediated by a disordered region in one protein binding to a groove in a folded interaction domain in the other one. While the main determinants of a certain interaction are typically found within a well-defined binding interface involving the groove, recent studies show that nonspecific contacts by flanking regions may increase the affinity. One example is the coupled binding and folding underlying the interaction between the two transcriptional coactivators NCOA3 (ACTR) and CBP, where the flanking regions of an intrinsically disordered region in human NCOA3 increases the affinity for CBP. However, it is not clear whether this flanking region-mediated effect is a peculiarity of this single protein interaction or if it is of functional relevance in a broader context. To further assess the role of flanking regions in the interaction between NCOA3 and CBP, we analyzed the interaction across orthologs and paralogs (NCOA1, 2, and 3) in human, zebra fish, and ghost shark. We found that flanking regions increased the affinity 2- to 9-fold in the six interactions tested. Conservation of the amino acid sequence is a strong indicator of function. Analogously, the observed conservation of increased affinity provided by flanking regions, accompanied by moderate sequence conservation, suggests that flanking regions may be under selection to promote the affinity between NCOA transcriptional coregulators and CBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.